Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link
user80705
user80705

In Conways game of life, there is a the concept of an orhpanorphan pattern.

Basically, an orphan is a finite pattern such that each configuration containing that pattern is a Garden of Eden (a pattern that cannot have a predecessor).

The smallest such pattern has not been found yet. A computer search 2011, restricted to symmetric orphans gave a pattern that fits in a 10x11 rectangle.

Thus, the smallest orphan will fit in a 10x11 rectangle, but it is probably smaller. Note that there are roughly $2^{10 \times 11}$ possible configurations that fit within these bounds.

In Conways game of life, there is a the concept of an orhpan pattern.

Basically, an orphan is a finite pattern such that each configuration containing that pattern is a Garden of Eden (a pattern that cannot have a predecessor).

The smallest such pattern has not been found yet. A computer search 2011, restricted to symmetric orphans gave a pattern that fits in a 10x11 rectangle.

Thus, the smallest orphan will fit in a 10x11 rectangle, but it is probably smaller. Note that there are roughly $2^{10 \times 11}$ possible configurations that fit within these bounds.

In Conways game of life, there is a the concept of an orphan pattern.

Basically, an orphan is a finite pattern such that each configuration containing that pattern is a Garden of Eden (a pattern that cannot have a predecessor).

The smallest such pattern has not been found yet. A computer search 2011, restricted to symmetric orphans gave a pattern that fits in a 10x11 rectangle.

Thus, the smallest orphan will fit in a 10x11 rectangle, but it is probably smaller. Note that there are roughly $2^{10 \times 11}$ possible configurations that fit within these bounds.

10x11 is not a square;)
Source Link
Mikhail Bondarko
  • 16.9k
  • 4
  • 34
  • 97

In Conways game of life, there is a the concept of an orhpan pattern.

Basically, an orphan is a finite pattern such that each configuration containing that pattern is a Garden of Eden (a pattern that cannot have a predecessor).

The smallest such pattern has not been found yet. A computer search 2011, restricted to symmetric orphans gave a pattern that fits in a 10x11 squarerectangle.

Thus, the smallest orphan will fit in a 10x11 squarerectangle, but it is probably smaller. Note that there are roughly $2^{10 \times 11}$ possible configurations that fit within these bounds.

In Conways game of life, there is a the concept of an orhpan pattern.

Basically, an orphan is a finite pattern such that each configuration containing that pattern is a Garden of Eden (a pattern that cannot have a predecessor).

The smallest such pattern has not been found yet. A computer search 2011, restricted to symmetric orphans gave a pattern that fits in a 10x11 square.

Thus, the smallest orphan will fit in a 10x11 square, but it is probably smaller. Note that there are roughly $2^{10 \times 11}$ possible configurations that fit within these bounds.

In Conways game of life, there is a the concept of an orhpan pattern.

Basically, an orphan is a finite pattern such that each configuration containing that pattern is a Garden of Eden (a pattern that cannot have a predecessor).

The smallest such pattern has not been found yet. A computer search 2011, restricted to symmetric orphans gave a pattern that fits in a 10x11 rectangle.

Thus, the smallest orphan will fit in a 10x11 rectangle, but it is probably smaller. Note that there are roughly $2^{10 \times 11}$ possible configurations that fit within these bounds.

Source Link
Per Alexandersson
  • 15.8k
  • 10
  • 74
  • 133

In Conways game of life, there is a the concept of an orhpan pattern.

Basically, an orphan is a finite pattern such that each configuration containing that pattern is a Garden of Eden (a pattern that cannot have a predecessor).

The smallest such pattern has not been found yet. A computer search 2011, restricted to symmetric orphans gave a pattern that fits in a 10x11 square.

Thus, the smallest orphan will fit in a 10x11 square, but it is probably smaller. Note that there are roughly $2^{10 \times 11}$ possible configurations that fit within these bounds.

Post Made Community Wiki by Per Alexandersson