Timeline for a question about connected open sets in $R^2$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2014 at 0:39 | comment | added | Włodzimierz Holsztyński | Yes, a simple and nice answer. | |
| Nov 27, 2014 at 17:05 | comment | added | Emil Jeřábek | For completeness, I note that Alexandre Eremenko’s answer to the new question also answers the $\overline U\subseteq V$ question. | |
| Nov 27, 2014 at 15:34 | vote | accept | user173856 | ||
| Nov 27, 2014 at 15:34 | vote | accept | user173856 | ||
| Nov 27, 2014 at 15:34 | |||||
| Nov 27, 2014 at 15:23 | comment | added | Mirko | right, I ponder how this answer relates to the current version of the question (did not see the original formulation). I like the new (current) version, but nevertheless it is a bit confusing (and time-consuming) to try to figure out how this answer relates to it. | |
| Nov 27, 2014 at 15:18 | comment | added | Ramiro de la Vega | @user173856, you should´t change your question after a good answer has been given to the original one. | |
| Nov 27, 2014 at 14:45 | comment | added | Emil Jeřábek | I am wondering about that, too. It seems rather more difficult. | |
| Nov 27, 2014 at 14:40 | comment | added | Ramiro de la Vega | Nice! What if one assume that $\bar{U} \subseteq V$? | |
| Nov 27, 2014 at 14:31 | history | answered | Emil Jeřábek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |