Timeline for Simplicial version of the A-infinity operad
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2023 at 16:19 | answer | added | Patrick Elliott | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 24, 2014 at 0:07 | vote | accept | Kaj | ||
| Nov 23, 2014 at 18:12 | answer | added | Denis Nardin | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 23, 2014 at 16:36 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | @DenisNardin I think you could leave this as an answer, so that the question does not remain in the queue of "unanswered" questions | |
| Nov 23, 2014 at 15:59 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 25, 2014 at 3:55 | |||||
| Nov 23, 2014 at 15:44 | comment | added | David White | The question has already been answered in the comments. | |
| Nov 22, 2014 at 15:57 | comment | added | Denis Nardin | Theorem 5.2.6.10 for $k=1$ should be what you're looking for, with example 5.1.0.7 providing the small combinatorial model for $E_1$. | |
| Nov 22, 2014 at 15:33 | comment | added | Kaj | Hmm, yes. I guess my underlying hope was that there was a small concrete model with finitely many nondegenerate simplices described in a combinatorial manner. A subset of simplices of the Barratt-Eccles operad or something similar. Did you have a particular section/statement in Higher Algebra in mind by the way? | |
| Nov 22, 2014 at 15:01 | comment | added | Denis Nardin | Why the version described in "Geometry of iterated loop spaces" isn't enough? Ok it's written for topological spaces but it should work for simplicial sets too. Alternatively you could look in "Higher Algebra" where everything is done in terms of simplicial sets (but with a much more sophisticated approach) | |
| Nov 22, 2014 at 11:41 | review | First posts | |||
| Nov 22, 2014 at 11:55 | |||||
| Nov 22, 2014 at 11:37 | history | asked | Kaj | CC BY-SA 3.0 |