Timeline for Integer points (very naive question)
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2010 at 16:57 | vote | accept | Qfwfq | ||
| Mar 19, 2010 at 16:57 | vote | accept | Qfwfq | ||
| Mar 19, 2010 at 16:57 | |||||
| Mar 19, 2010 at 16:06 | vote | accept | Qfwfq | ||
| Mar 19, 2010 at 16:57 | |||||
| Mar 19, 2010 at 15:15 | answer | added | Martin Bright | timeline score: 12 | |
| Mar 19, 2010 at 15:08 | answer | added | Andrea Ferretti | timeline score: 22 | |
| Mar 19, 2010 at 14:37 | comment | added | Qfwfq | @Q.Y.: So? A morphism from specZ to X would of course be a morphism of schemes, not of schemes-over-C. What I was asking is whether there is -in any sense- an interplay between considering "further structure" on X and the notion of "integer point". [BTW, what's the correct definition of integer point? ] | |
| Mar 19, 2010 at 14:23 | answer | added | Georges Elencwajg | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 19, 2010 at 14:05 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | Spec Z is not an object in the category of schemes over C... | |
| Mar 19, 2010 at 14:00 | history | asked | Qfwfq | CC BY-SA 2.5 |