Timeline for A question on the size of an admissible ordinal
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jun 28 at 1:58 | history | suggested | C7X |
Relevant tags
|
|
| Jun 27 at 19:50 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 28 at 1:58 | |||||
| Jun 27 at 17:53 | vote | accept | Frode Alfson Bjørdal | ||
| Jun 27 at 11:06 | answer | added | C7X | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 20, 2014 at 14:35 | history | edited | Frode Alfson Bjørdal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Nov 15, 2014 at 16:58 | comment | added | Frode Alfson Bjørdal | That may well be, and I thought so as well. Perhaps I misunderstood a comment in a communication. May someone else confirm, so that I perhaps should delete the question? Does someone have references to literature on this? | |
| Nov 15, 2014 at 12:35 | comment | added | Wojowu | Isn't this by definition $\Sigma_3$-admissible ordinal? | |
| Nov 15, 2014 at 12:02 | history | edited | Frode Alfson Bjørdal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Nov 15, 2014 at 0:23 | history | asked | Frode Alfson Bjørdal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |