Timeline for pull-back connection
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2021 at 0:48 | comment | added | Sherose | If we define by this, then well-definedness problem comes out: for any section, it may admit different linear combinations. So how to prove the definition is independent of choice? | |
| Sep 3, 2019 at 18:21 | comment | added | Ali Taghavi | @seub as another counter example $f:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}\quad f(x)=x^2$ pull back sections are just even functions. | |
| Mar 4, 2019 at 16:01 | comment | added | peter | say $F(t_0)=F(t_1)$ is the self-intersection, then let $\varphi_j(t_j)=1$ and $\varphi_j(t_{1-j})=0$ and $\varphi_0+\varphi_1=1$. then in the supports of these coefficients the curve is injective. | |
| Sep 9, 2018 at 17:22 | comment | added | seub | Can you prove your first claim? It sounds just false to me. For example, take $F : [0,1] \to B$ a curve with a self-intersection. | |
| Nov 11, 2014 at 7:30 | review | Late answers | |||
| Nov 11, 2014 at 8:29 | |||||
| Nov 11, 2014 at 7:15 | review | First posts | |||
| Nov 11, 2014 at 8:33 | |||||
| Nov 11, 2014 at 7:11 | history | answered | Peter Hochs | CC BY-SA 3.0 |