Several recent papers haveEdit: This question has been publishedsignificantly revised.
Some recent developments in computer graphicscomputational geometry (for example see http://geometry.stanford.edu//papers/fmfrmbs-obsbg-12/fmfrmbs-obsbg-12.pdf) are based on the idea of considering the pullback of a functional map, which is usually defined as follows. Let $M$ and $N$ bemap between two manifolds. For a bijective continuous map $T:M \to N$, As the functional map corresponding to $T$pullback is defined by $$T_F : L^2(M,\mathbb{R}) \to L^2(N,\mathbb{R})~~~~T_F(f)=f \circ T^{-1}$$ This definition has led to many significant computational results in the past two yearsa linear map (i.e. see http://www.lix.polytechnique.fr/~maks/papers/obsbg_fmaps.pdfinsofar that it is well-defined), however not muchit is yet known about functional maps theoretically, i.e. how bestmuch more friendly to formulate them rigoroulsy, what properties they satisfywork with than the original map, etcand many tools from Hilbert spaces can now be exploited. Functional maps are formally similar to However, the transpose of"price paid" is that now you are perhaps working in a linear map (or rather its inverse)higher dimensional space, howeveror some information about the spaces $M$ and $N$ of most interest are compact manifolds rather than vector spacesoriginal map is lost.
I would beam very interested to learn of any related concepts orother mathematics literature that would helpmay be related to better understand functional mapsthese ideas or this approach. Thank you very much.