Skip to main content
deleted 241 characters in body; edited title
Source Link

Functional Maps Exploiting the Linearity of the Pullback

Several recent papers haveEdit: This question has been publishedsignificantly revised.

Some recent developments in computer graphicscomputational geometry (for example see http://geometry.stanford.edu//papers/fmfrmbs-obsbg-12/fmfrmbs-obsbg-12.pdf) are based on the idea of considering the pullback of a functional map, which is usually defined as follows. Let $M$ and $N$ bemap between two manifolds. For a bijective continuous map $T:M \to N$, As the functional map corresponding to $T$pullback is defined by $$T_F : L^2(M,\mathbb{R}) \to L^2(N,\mathbb{R})~~~~T_F(f)=f \circ T^{-1}$$ This definition has led to many significant computational results in the past two yearsa linear map (i.e. see http://www.lix.polytechnique.fr/~maks/papers/obsbg_fmaps.pdfinsofar that it is well-defined), however not muchit is yet known about functional maps theoretically, i.e. how bestmuch more friendly to formulate them rigoroulsy, what properties they satisfywork with than the original map, etcand many tools from Hilbert spaces can now be exploited. Functional maps are formally similar to However, the transpose of"price paid" is that now you are perhaps working in a linear map (or rather its inverse)higher dimensional space, howeveror some information about the spaces $M$ and $N$ of most interest are compact manifolds rather than vector spacesoriginal map is lost.

I would beam very interested to learn of any related concepts orother mathematics literature that would helpmay be related to better understand functional mapsthese ideas or this approach. Thank you very much.

Functional Maps

Several recent papers have been published in computer graphics based on the idea of a functional map, which is usually defined as follows. Let $M$ and $N$ be manifolds. For a bijective continuous map $T:M \to N$, the functional map corresponding to $T$ is defined by $$T_F : L^2(M,\mathbb{R}) \to L^2(N,\mathbb{R})~~~~T_F(f)=f \circ T^{-1}$$ This definition has led to many significant computational results in the past two years (i.e. see http://www.lix.polytechnique.fr/~maks/papers/obsbg_fmaps.pdf), however not much is yet known about functional maps theoretically, i.e. how best to formulate them rigoroulsy, what properties they satisfy, etc. Functional maps are formally similar to the transpose of a linear map (or rather its inverse), however the spaces $M$ and $N$ of most interest are compact manifolds rather than vector spaces.

I would be very interested to learn of any related concepts or mathematics literature that would help to better understand functional maps. Thank you.

Exploiting the Linearity of the Pullback

Edit: This question has been significantly revised.

Some recent developments in computational geometry (for example see http://geometry.stanford.edu//papers/fmfrmbs-obsbg-12/fmfrmbs-obsbg-12.pdf) are based on the idea of considering the pullback of a map between two manifolds. As the pullback is a linear map (insofar that it is well-defined), it is much more friendly to work with than the original map, and many tools from Hilbert spaces can now be exploited. However, the "price paid" is that now you are perhaps working in a higher dimensional space, or some information about the original map is lost.

I am very interested to learn of any other mathematics literature that may be related to these ideas or this approach. Thank you very much.

Post Closed as "Needs details or clarity" by Ricardo Andrade, Yemon Choi, Stefan Waldmann, Neil Strickland, Boris Bukh

Several recent papers have been published in computer graphics based on the idea of a functional map, which is usually defined as follows. Let $M$ and $N$ be manifolds. For a bijective continuous map $T:M \to N$, the functional map corresponding to $T$ is defined by $T_F : L^2(M,\mathbb{R}) \to L^2(N,\mathbb{R}), T_F(f)=f \circ T^{-1}$. This$$T_F : L^2(M,\mathbb{R}) \to L^2(N,\mathbb{R})~~~~T_F(f)=f \circ T^{-1}$$ This definition has led to many significant computational results in the past two years (i.e. see http://www.lix.polytechnique.fr/~maks/papers/obsbg_fmaps.pdf), however not much is yet known about functional maps theoretically, i.e. how best to formulate them rigoroulsy, what properties they satisfy, etc. Functional maps are formally similar to the transpose of a linear map (or rather its inverse), however the spaces $M$ and $N$ of most interest are compact manifolds rather than vector spaces.

I would be very interested to learn of any related concepts or mathematics literature that would help to better understand functional maps. Thank you.

Several recent papers have been published in computer graphics based on the idea of a functional map, which is usually defined as follows. Let $M$ and $N$ be manifolds. For a bijective continuous map $T:M \to N$, the functional map corresponding to $T$ is defined by $T_F : L^2(M,\mathbb{R}) \to L^2(N,\mathbb{R}), T_F(f)=f \circ T^{-1}$. This definition has led to many significant computational results in the past two years (i.e. see http://www.lix.polytechnique.fr/~maks/papers/obsbg_fmaps.pdf), however not much is yet known about functional maps theoretically, i.e. how best to formulate them rigoroulsy, what properties they satisfy, etc. Functional maps are formally similar to the transpose of a linear map (or rather its inverse), however the spaces $M$ and $N$ of most interest are compact manifolds rather than vector spaces.

I would be very interested to learn of any related concepts or mathematics literature that would help to better understand functional maps. Thank you.

Several recent papers have been published in computer graphics based on the idea of a functional map, which is usually defined as follows. Let $M$ and $N$ be manifolds. For a bijective continuous map $T:M \to N$, the functional map corresponding to $T$ is defined by $$T_F : L^2(M,\mathbb{R}) \to L^2(N,\mathbb{R})~~~~T_F(f)=f \circ T^{-1}$$ This definition has led to many significant computational results in the past two years (i.e. see http://www.lix.polytechnique.fr/~maks/papers/obsbg_fmaps.pdf), however not much is yet known about functional maps theoretically, i.e. how best to formulate them rigoroulsy, what properties they satisfy, etc. Functional maps are formally similar to the transpose of a linear map (or rather its inverse), however the spaces $M$ and $N$ of most interest are compact manifolds rather than vector spaces.

I would be very interested to learn of any related concepts or mathematics literature that would help to better understand functional maps. Thank you.

Source Link

Functional Maps

Several recent papers have been published in computer graphics based on the idea of a functional map, which is usually defined as follows. Let $M$ and $N$ be manifolds. For a bijective continuous map $T:M \to N$, the functional map corresponding to $T$ is defined by $T_F : L^2(M,\mathbb{R}) \to L^2(N,\mathbb{R}), T_F(f)=f \circ T^{-1}$. This definition has led to many significant computational results in the past two years (i.e. see http://www.lix.polytechnique.fr/~maks/papers/obsbg_fmaps.pdf), however not much is yet known about functional maps theoretically, i.e. how best to formulate them rigoroulsy, what properties they satisfy, etc. Functional maps are formally similar to the transpose of a linear map (or rather its inverse), however the spaces $M$ and $N$ of most interest are compact manifolds rather than vector spaces.

I would be very interested to learn of any related concepts or mathematics literature that would help to better understand functional maps. Thank you.