Skip to main content
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Source Link

I presume that by $\widehat{\mathcal{O}}_{X, V}$ you mean the ring obtained by completing the local ring at the generic point of $V$ at its maximal ideal.

You're right that your description ($\widehat{\mathcal{O}}_{X, V}=K(V)[[x_1, ..., x_k]]$) follows immediately from the Cohen structure theorem (see e.g. 10.149.8 here); in fact it is not necessary that everything be smooth, just that the local ring at the generic point of $V$ is regular. Indeed, any complete regular local ring containing a field is a power series ring over a field. In this case, your ring contains $K(V)$, and $K(V)$ is the maximal field it contains (because it is isomorphic to its residue field, for example). This is prove on page 11 here, for example. The fact that $k$ equals the codimension follows by considering the Krull dimension of the local ring at the generic point of $V$.

But I suspect that this is not what you mean to look for; this is something like "an infinitesimal neighborhood of the generic point of $V$". I suspect you really mean to look at the formal scheme obtained by completing $X$ at $V$. This is the topologically locally ringed space whose underlying topological space is the same as that of $V$, but whose sheaf of rings is given by taking the ring of functions on $X$ completed at the ideal defining $V$. This is a much better notion of an "infinitesimal neighborhood of $V$"; I usually tell people it is something like an "infinitesimal tubular neighborhood." Formal schemes are described briefly in Hartshorne, but as in Reimundo Heluani's comment, EGA is a much better reference (I think this is EGA $\text{III}_1$, which is a comparatively gentle part of EGA).

In particular, the formal scheme obtained this way, which I'll call $\hat V$, remembers the normal bundle of $V$ in $X$; it is the same as the normal bundle of $V$ in $\hat V$, appropriately defined! In certain very nice cases, it is isomorphic to the formal scheme obtained by completing the total space of the normal bundle of $V$ in $X$ at its zero section, but that is not always the case. See e.g. the comments to this Mathoverflow answerthis Mathoverflow answer of Jason Starr's.

I presume that by $\widehat{\mathcal{O}}_{X, V}$ you mean the ring obtained by completing the local ring at the generic point of $V$ at its maximal ideal.

You're right that your description ($\widehat{\mathcal{O}}_{X, V}=K(V)[[x_1, ..., x_k]]$) follows immediately from the Cohen structure theorem (see e.g. 10.149.8 here); in fact it is not necessary that everything be smooth, just that the local ring at the generic point of $V$ is regular. Indeed, any complete regular local ring containing a field is a power series ring over a field. In this case, your ring contains $K(V)$, and $K(V)$ is the maximal field it contains (because it is isomorphic to its residue field, for example). This is prove on page 11 here, for example. The fact that $k$ equals the codimension follows by considering the Krull dimension of the local ring at the generic point of $V$.

But I suspect that this is not what you mean to look for; this is something like "an infinitesimal neighborhood of the generic point of $V$". I suspect you really mean to look at the formal scheme obtained by completing $X$ at $V$. This is the topologically locally ringed space whose underlying topological space is the same as that of $V$, but whose sheaf of rings is given by taking the ring of functions on $X$ completed at the ideal defining $V$. This is a much better notion of an "infinitesimal neighborhood of $V$"; I usually tell people it is something like an "infinitesimal tubular neighborhood." Formal schemes are described briefly in Hartshorne, but as in Reimundo Heluani's comment, EGA is a much better reference (I think this is EGA $\text{III}_1$, which is a comparatively gentle part of EGA).

In particular, the formal scheme obtained this way, which I'll call $\hat V$, remembers the normal bundle of $V$ in $X$; it is the same as the normal bundle of $V$ in $\hat V$, appropriately defined! In certain very nice cases, it is isomorphic to the formal scheme obtained by completing the total space of the normal bundle of $V$ in $X$ at its zero section, but that is not always the case. See e.g. the comments to this Mathoverflow answer of Jason Starr's.

I presume that by $\widehat{\mathcal{O}}_{X, V}$ you mean the ring obtained by completing the local ring at the generic point of $V$ at its maximal ideal.

You're right that your description ($\widehat{\mathcal{O}}_{X, V}=K(V)[[x_1, ..., x_k]]$) follows immediately from the Cohen structure theorem (see e.g. 10.149.8 here); in fact it is not necessary that everything be smooth, just that the local ring at the generic point of $V$ is regular. Indeed, any complete regular local ring containing a field is a power series ring over a field. In this case, your ring contains $K(V)$, and $K(V)$ is the maximal field it contains (because it is isomorphic to its residue field, for example). This is prove on page 11 here, for example. The fact that $k$ equals the codimension follows by considering the Krull dimension of the local ring at the generic point of $V$.

But I suspect that this is not what you mean to look for; this is something like "an infinitesimal neighborhood of the generic point of $V$". I suspect you really mean to look at the formal scheme obtained by completing $X$ at $V$. This is the topologically locally ringed space whose underlying topological space is the same as that of $V$, but whose sheaf of rings is given by taking the ring of functions on $X$ completed at the ideal defining $V$. This is a much better notion of an "infinitesimal neighborhood of $V$"; I usually tell people it is something like an "infinitesimal tubular neighborhood." Formal schemes are described briefly in Hartshorne, but as in Reimundo Heluani's comment, EGA is a much better reference (I think this is EGA $\text{III}_1$, which is a comparatively gentle part of EGA).

In particular, the formal scheme obtained this way, which I'll call $\hat V$, remembers the normal bundle of $V$ in $X$; it is the same as the normal bundle of $V$ in $\hat V$, appropriately defined! In certain very nice cases, it is isomorphic to the formal scheme obtained by completing the total space of the normal bundle of $V$ in $X$ at its zero section, but that is not always the case. See e.g. the comments to this Mathoverflow answer of Jason Starr's.

Bounty Ended with 50 reputation awarded by CommunityBot
Source Link
Daniel Litt
  • 23k
  • 5
  • 84
  • 144

I presume that by $\widehat{\mathcal{O}}_{X, V}$ you mean the ring obtained by completing the local ring at the generic point of $V$ at its maximal ideal.

You're right that your description ($\widehat{\mathcal{O}}_{X, V}=K(V)[[x_1, ..., x_k]]$) follows immediately from the Cohen structure theorem (see e.g. 10.149.8 here); in fact it is not necessary that everything be smooth, just that the local ring at the generic point of $V$ is regular. Indeed, any complete regular local ring containing a field is a power series ring over a field. In this case, your ring contains $K(V)$, and $K(V)$ is the maximal field it contains (because it is isomorphic to its residue field, for example). This is prove on page 11 here, for example. The fact that $k$ equals the codimension follows by considering the Krull dimension of the local ring at the generic point of $V$.

But I suspect that this is not what you mean to look for; this is something like "an infinitesimal neighborhood of the generic point of $V$". I suspect you really mean to look at the formal scheme obtained by completing $X$ at $V$. This is the topologically locally ringed space whose underlying topological space is the same as that of $V$, but whose sheaf of rings is given by taking the ring of functions on $X$ completed at the ideal defining $V$. This is a much better notion of an "infinitesimal neighborhood of $V$"; I usually tell people it is something like an "infinitesimal tubular neighborhood." Formal schemes are described briefly in Hartshorne, but as in Reimundo Heluani's comment, EGA is a much better reference (I think this is EGA $\text{III}_1$, which is a comparatively gentle part of EGA).

In particular, the formal scheme obtained this way, which I'll call $\hat V$, remembers the normal bundle of $V$ in $X$; it is the same as the normal bundle of $V$ in $\hat V$, appropriately defined! In certain very nice cases, it is isomorphic to the formal scheme obtained by completing the total space of the normal bundle of $V$ in $X$ at its zero section, but that is not always the case. See e.g. the comments to this Mathoverflow answer of Jason Starr's.