Timeline for Is a number field uniquely determined by the primes which split in it?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2016 at 12:53 | comment | added | Venkataramana | The following answer to a MO question also addresses this question. mathoverflow.net/q/3450 | |
| Nov 6, 2014 at 4:11 | history | edited | Venkataramana | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Nov 6, 2014 at 3:40 | history | edited | Venkataramana | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 22 characters in body
|
| Nov 6, 2014 at 1:06 | history | edited | Venkataramana | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 878 characters in body
|
| Nov 5, 2014 at 14:29 | comment | added | user1073 | I just thought that it was worth pointing out that number fields with the same Dedekind zeta functions are called "arithmetically equivalent" and were studied by Robert Perlis (sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022314X77900701#) where he showed that they can only arise from the the group theoretic condition mentioned by Venkataramana. (Number theorists tend to call these groups "Gassmann equivalent", whereas Riemannian geometers call them "almost conjugate". They are closely related to the construction of isospectral non-isometric Riemannian manifolds.) | |
| Nov 5, 2014 at 12:42 | history | edited | Venkataramana | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 21 characters in body
|
| Nov 5, 2014 at 10:44 | vote | accept | Daniel Loughran | ||
| Nov 5, 2014 at 10:35 | history | answered | Venkataramana | CC BY-SA 3.0 |