Timeline for Finding a norm on $ \mathbb{R}^X $ such that the "natural" embedding of a metric space $ X $ in $ \mathbb{R}^X $ becomes an isometry
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2015 at 23:25 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | In my definition I require $f(x_0)=0$ | |
| Mar 19, 2015 at 21:37 | comment | added | Fan Zheng | But is it a norm? It seems that $\delta_{x_0}$ has norm 0. | |
| Jan 22, 2015 at 17:15 | vote | accept | Ormi | ||
| Dec 23, 2014 at 2:29 | history | edited | Yemon Choi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Finally got round to filling in the details I omitted when I first wrote this
|
| Nov 5, 2014 at 14:02 | comment | added | J. Alejandro Chávez-Domínguez | The Godefroy-Kalton paper is available at kaltonmemorial.missouri.edu/docs/sm2003c.pdf | |
| Nov 4, 2014 at 22:20 | comment | added | Ormi | Thank you for the answer. Unfortunately I can't quite find those books you suggested available anywhere. I guess I'll just familiarise myself with uniform spaces and then will be able to read the original Aren and Eell's paper. | |
| Nov 4, 2014 at 19:54 | history | answered | Yemon Choi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |