Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 30, 2014 at 19:45 vote accept tailcalled
Oct 29, 2014 at 11:45 comment added tailcalled Johannes Hahn: I know, but the numbers in $R[X]/(X^2-K)$ can be given an order (the order I described) which 'causes' the square root to be the positive one. Gerry Myerson: No need to deal with negative $K$.
Oct 29, 2014 at 2:21 answer added Robert Israel timeline score: 0
Oct 29, 2014 at 0:13 comment added Gerry Myerson Do you need to deal with ${\bf R}[X]/(X^2+1)$? and if so, how do you do it?
Oct 28, 2014 at 23:44 comment added Johannes Hahn Sidenote: You don't want $R[X]/(X^2-K)$, because in this ring there is no preferred choice of a square root of $K$. You want a ring that has such a preferred square root, i.e. the positive one. Thus this isn't really about rings and ring extensions, it is about totally ordered rings and extensions of totally ordered rings.
Oct 28, 2014 at 23:40 history edited Johannes Hahn
added computer-algebra tag
Oct 28, 2014 at 22:39 comment added Anthony Quas I asked essentially the same question some time ago: mathoverflow.net/questions/69805/… You may find some useful information in Igor Rivin's answer to that also.
Oct 28, 2014 at 20:48 answer added Emil Jeřábek timeline score: 2
Oct 28, 2014 at 20:01 comment added tailcalled In the second paragraph, I explained a way to compare elements in $R[X]/(X^2-K)$ (when you already have a method of comparing elements in $R$). That is the method I was talking about when I wrote 'this method'.
Oct 28, 2014 at 19:59 comment added Włodzimierz Holsztyński ...this method...--which method?
Oct 28, 2014 at 19:59 comment added tailcalled Also, in case what 'sufficiently nice' means becomes relevant, I can guarantee that any ordered ring that is a subring of an archimedean field is sufficiently nice, and I do not for now need anything more general than that.
Oct 28, 2014 at 19:47 history asked tailcalled CC BY-SA 3.0