Timeline for Geodesic comparison in Hadamard space
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2014 at 9:05 | vote | accept | user35593 | ||
| Oct 29, 2014 at 1:13 | history | edited | Anton Petrunin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 148 characters in body
|
| Oct 29, 2014 at 1:04 | comment | added | Anton Petrunin | I did not see it, but the same construction gives non-uniqueness for $m=3$ and $n=4$; I will update my answer. | |
| Oct 28, 2014 at 5:42 | comment | added | user35593 | Yes but then $a_1,\dots,a_m$ do all lie on the same geodesic (The geodesic connecting $a_1$ and $a_2$). My claim excludes this case. | |
| Oct 28, 2014 at 1:48 | history | answered | Anton Petrunin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |