Skip to main content
added 5 characters in body
Source Link
GH from MO
  • 105.4k
  • 8
  • 293
  • 398

Hejhal uses that $K\in L^2(F\times F)$, which follows from the continuity of $K$ and the compactness of $F$. The latter assumption appears on the first page of Hejhal's book: "Let $F$ denote a compact Riemann surface of genus $g\geq 2$." Iwaniec deals with the general case. So both Hejhal and Iwaniec are right, but Iwaniec is more general.

Hejhal uses that $K\in L^2(F\times F)$, which follows from the continuity of $K$ and the compactness of $F$. The latter assumption appears on the first of Hejhal's book: "Let $F$ denote a compact Riemann surface of genus $g\geq 2$." Iwaniec deals with the general case. So both Hejhal and Iwaniec are right, but Iwaniec is more general.

Hejhal uses that $K\in L^2(F\times F)$, which follows from the continuity of $K$ and the compactness of $F$. The latter assumption appears on the first page of Hejhal's book: "Let $F$ denote a compact Riemann surface of genus $g\geq 2$." Iwaniec deals with the general case. So both Hejhal and Iwaniec are right, but Iwaniec is more general.

Source Link
GH from MO
  • 105.4k
  • 8
  • 293
  • 398

Hejhal uses that $K\in L^2(F\times F)$, which follows from the continuity of $K$ and the compactness of $F$. The latter assumption appears on the first of Hejhal's book: "Let $F$ denote a compact Riemann surface of genus $g\geq 2$." Iwaniec deals with the general case. So both Hejhal and Iwaniec are right, but Iwaniec is more general.