Timeline for Compact induction as a tensor product
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2014 at 16:58 | comment | added | Question Mark | Regarding your P.S., isn't it more natural to require the support be compact modulo $H$ because the support will in any event be a union of right cosets of $H$? | |
| Oct 24, 2014 at 14:22 | comment | added | Paul Broussous | Don't you need that $H$ is open in $G$ ? I think that for taking the tensor product of ${\mathcal H}(G)$ over ${\mathcal H}(H)$ (the Hecke algebras of $G$ and $H$ respectively), you need an inclusion ${\mathcal H}(H)\subset {\mathcal H}(G)$ which exists only when $H$ is open in $G$ ... | |
| Oct 24, 2014 at 7:20 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 24, 2014 at 7:21 | |||||
| Oct 24, 2014 at 7:18 | history | answered | PL. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |