Timeline for How should I visualise RP^n?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 4, 2011 at 7:49 | history | edited | Stephen S |
edited tags
|
|
Jul 7, 2010 at 0:55 | history | edited | Jose Brox |
edited tags
|
|
Mar 29, 2010 at 6:58 | answer | added | Dev Sinha | timeline score: 5 | |
Mar 18, 2010 at 2:51 | answer | added | Elizabeth S. Q. Goodman | timeline score: 7 | |
Mar 17, 2010 at 23:50 | vote | accept | Tom Smith | ||
Mar 17, 2010 at 23:42 | comment | added | Michael Benfield | Have you just looked at the simple case to understand that attachment? Draw RP^1 as a circle with a dot on it. Then you take an open 2d ball, and you want to attach its boundary to the circle you've just drawn... but you have to do it in a way that you wrap the boundary all the way around the circle twice. Then you've got RP^2. In effect this is the same thing as taking a closed 2d ball, then taking the quotient identifying antipodal points of its boundary. | |
Mar 17, 2010 at 23:28 | answer | added | Sammy Black | timeline score: 4 | |
Mar 17, 2010 at 23:12 | answer | added | Qiaochu Yuan | timeline score: 19 | |
Mar 17, 2010 at 23:06 | answer | added | Dan Ramras | timeline score: 11 | |
Mar 17, 2010 at 22:59 | history | edited | Tom Smith | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 490 characters in body
|
Mar 17, 2010 at 22:48 | answer | added | Deane Yang | timeline score: 13 | |
Mar 17, 2010 at 22:35 | history | asked | Tom Smith | CC BY-SA 2.5 |