Timeline for A proof about an unconditional basis theorem
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2010 at 19:23 | vote | accept | Dan | ||
| Mar 18, 2010 at 19:23 | vote | accept | Dan | ||
| Mar 18, 2010 at 19:23 | |||||
| Mar 18, 2010 at 19:23 | vote | accept | Dan | ||
| Mar 18, 2010 at 19:23 | |||||
| Mar 17, 2010 at 20:21 | answer | added | Bill Johnson | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 17, 2010 at 20:12 | answer | added | Yemon Choi | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 17, 2010 at 19:45 | comment | added | Mark Meckes | This article also refers to arxiv.org/abs/math/9205204, which, like Lindenstrauss and Tzafriri, does not state the lemma explicitly in that form. | |
| Mar 17, 2010 at 19:28 | comment | added | Mark Meckes | arxiv.org/abs/math.FA/0501105 | |
| Mar 17, 2010 at 18:44 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | For those of us who don't have access to the article, would you mind stating the Lemma? | |
| Mar 17, 2010 at 18:43 | history | asked | Dan | CC BY-SA 2.5 |