Timeline for Lower bound of first moment of $L$-function on $\mathrm{GL}(3)$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 20, 2014 at 13:36 | answer | added | H.Flip | timeline score: 4 | |
S Oct 20, 2014 at 5:03 | history | edited | Peter Humphries | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
LaTeX the title and notation
|
S Oct 20, 2014 at 5:03 | history | suggested | Paul | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
LaTeX the title and notation
|
Oct 20, 2014 at 4:38 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Oct 20, 2014 at 5:03 | |||||
Oct 20, 2014 at 2:22 | comment | added | Lucia | Yes, this kind of lower bound in $t$-aspect is trivial for any $L$-function. The point is that you can approximate $L(\frac 12+it)$ by some long Dirichlet polynomial $\sum_{n\le T^{r}} a(n)n^{-1/2-it}$, say, with $a(1)=1$, and the $L$-function coming from $GL(r)$, say. If you now integrate with smooth weights $L(1/2+it)$ (without absolute values), then note that only the term $n=1$ contributes. The rest of the terms cancel out and are negligible for smooth weights (rapid decay of Fourier transforms). So the bound $\gg T$ follows. | |
Oct 20, 2014 at 2:00 | history | asked | 7-adic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |