Skip to main content
18 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 23, 2014 at 4:19 vote accept Mohammad Farajzadeh-Tehrani
Dec 21, 2014 at 16:03 answer added Misha timeline score: 5
Dec 21, 2014 at 1:00 history edited Sam Nead
edited tags.
Dec 21, 2014 at 0:23 answer added Sam Nead timeline score: 7
Nov 20, 2014 at 17:10 answer added Holonomia timeline score: 2
Oct 20, 2014 at 10:23 comment added BS. Unfortunately I didn't found any recent textbook on this subject. By the way, the classification theorem proves that the semi-infinite Jacob ladder is homeomorphic to the "Loch Ness monster"! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loch_Ness_monster_surface
Oct 20, 2014 at 0:45 comment added Mohammad Farajzadeh-Tehrani For fun: Finite Jacob ladder can be seen here cambridgeblog.org/2013/01/into-the-intro-games-and-mathematic.
Oct 20, 2014 at 0:26 comment added Mohammad Farajzadeh-Tehrani @ BS: interesting, I had never heard of such terminologies. Is there any somewhat recent book discussing this sort of things!
Oct 19, 2014 at 15:06 comment added BS. It seems I was wrong. Kerekjarto says (if I correctly understood, p. 183 of "Vorlesungen uber Topologie) that this "homology covering" of a genus $g\geq 2$ surface has infinte genus and only one end (so $E=F$=point). So it is homeomorphic to the half-infinite "Jacob ladder".
Oct 19, 2014 at 8:21 comment added BS. The classification of noncompact boundaryless surfaces is more complicated than that. If orientable, they are classified genus (maybe infinite) and (homeo class of) a pair of compact totally disconnected metrisable spaces of ends $(E\supset F)$, with $F$ the subspace of nonplanar ends. This is due to Kerekjarto (1923). In your case, I would guess that $E$ is a Cantor and $F$ is empty, but this is only a guess.
Oct 18, 2014 at 14:04 comment added Mohammad Farajzadeh-Tehrani I think the following describes the generators:mathoverflow.net/questions/38413/…
Oct 18, 2014 at 11:37 comment added Mohammad Farajzadeh-Tehrani Of course it is infinite, but it should be still describe-able in terms on number of ends and genus; e.g. a pair of pants is genus zero with 3 ends. In this case, I feel it should be a genus 0 curve with infinity many ends dictated by the type of free graph.
Oct 18, 2014 at 11:22 comment added Mohammad Farajzadeh-Tehrani Thanks Seirios: But what is rank of it? Can we say that? at least for g=2?
Oct 18, 2014 at 5:36 comment added Ryan Budney Is there any particular dictionary for surfaces you would like to use, Mohammad? The surface has fairly direct descriptions in most ways I can think of thinking of surfaces.
Oct 18, 2014 at 5:10 comment added Qiaochu Yuan I would run that argument the other way: $\mathbb{H}/[G, G]$ is an infinite covering space of $\Sigma_g$, hence it is noncompact. As a noncompact surface, it's homotopy equivalent to a $1$-dimensional CW complex, hence its fundamental group is free.
Oct 18, 2014 at 3:50 comment added Seirios The commutator subgroup of a surface group is free. See corollary 4 at chiasme.wordpress.com/2014/08/27/on-subgroups-of-surface-groups In particular, it can be deduced that $\mathbb{H} / [G,G]$ is not compact from the abelianization of $G$.
Oct 18, 2014 at 0:55 history edited Mohammad Farajzadeh-Tehrani CC BY-SA 3.0
added 45 characters in body
Oct 18, 2014 at 0:46 history asked Mohammad Farajzadeh-Tehrani CC BY-SA 3.0