Timeline for What are the correct axioms for a "weakly associative monoidal functor"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2010 at 20:47 | vote | accept | Theo Johnson-Freyd | ||
| Mar 18, 2010 at 4:41 | answer | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 18, 2010 at 1:42 | answer | added | Harry Gindi | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 18, 2010 at 0:43 | answer | added | David Jordan | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 17, 2010 at 15:13 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | @SC: We probably do, so I'll look this afternoon. This is one of those: I was trying to figure it out, came home, thought more, decided I didn't know, and posted the question. We don't seem to have online access, is what I meant. | |
| Mar 17, 2010 at 11:48 | answer | added | Thomas Kragh | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 17, 2010 at 9:07 | answer | added | S. Carnahan♦ | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 17, 2010 at 8:47 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | I was under the impression that the Berkeley math library had copies of Contemp. Math. Is this not the case? | |
| Mar 17, 2010 at 5:44 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | Maybe looking at what properties the reasonable functor between the module category of a (quasi)Hopf algebra and that of a guage-equivalent (quasi)algebra might provide a hint on the correct axioms. | |
| Mar 17, 2010 at 5:38 | history | asked | Theo Johnson-Freyd | CC BY-SA 2.5 |