Timeline for Ordinary or Rational Generating Function for Associated Stirling Numbers $b(n,k)$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2016 at 19:59 | vote | accept | Eleven-Eleven | ||
| Sep 30, 2016 at 18:08 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | I understand that you want $\beta_k(x):=\sum_{n\ge0} b(n,k)x^n$: these are actually rational functions. | |
| Sep 30, 2016 at 17:59 | answer | added | Pietro Majer | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 14, 2014 at 23:03 | vote | accept | Eleven-Eleven | ||
| Dec 31, 2016 at 19:59 | |||||
| Oct 14, 2014 at 19:44 | answer | added | Max Alekseyev | timeline score: 5 | |
| Oct 14, 2014 at 19:26 | comment | added | Eleven-Eleven | I can see your point. Perhaps a non-rational then..... | |
| Oct 14, 2014 at 5:18 | comment | added | Amritanshu Prasad | The recurrence relation in oeis.org/A008299: b(n+1,k) = kb(n,k) + nb(n-1,k-1) makes me wonder whether the ordinary generating function can be rational. Note the occurence of n in the second term. | |
| Oct 14, 2014 at 2:55 | comment | added | Eleven-Eleven | Sorry...will do | |
| Oct 14, 2014 at 2:45 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | Cross-posted from MSE: math.stackexchange.com/questions/971991/… Please do not cross-post without saying so. And please wait a while for an answer at one site before cross-posting to another. | |
| Oct 14, 2014 at 2:04 | history | edited | Eleven-Eleven | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 439 characters in body
|
| Oct 14, 2014 at 1:14 | history | edited | Eleven-Eleven | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Oct 14, 2014 at 1:01 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 14, 2014 at 1:51 | |||||
| Oct 14, 2014 at 0:57 | history | asked | Eleven-Eleven | CC BY-SA 3.0 |