Timeline for Finite type/finite morphism
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2017 at 23:57 | comment | added | Arrow | @AndrewCritch tag 02LS seems to suggest finite iff proper with finite fibers holds in complete generality. | |
| Nov 25, 2009 at 10:15 | history | edited | Andrew Critch | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
elaboration / references
|
| Oct 22, 2009 at 13:38 | comment | added | Andrew Critch | My main advice is to just start reading through it. I found it a lot easier to read Hartshorne after a (very) cursory reading of EGA I. Get a copy printed off, so you can annotate it for yourself. For my own sanity, I also keep a few notes of my own with references to the theorems I think are important, like the ones I mentioned above. (By the way, my EGA I reference is for the 1971 edition.) | |
| Oct 22, 2009 at 13:35 | history | edited | Andrew Critch | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
"1971"
|
| Oct 22, 2009 at 12:23 | comment | added | user709 | BTW, just out of curiosity, how do you manage to be so familiar with EGA? Quoting section by section is really impressive. | |
| Oct 22, 2009 at 7:56 | comment | added | Andrew Critch | Sure! Also, I just clarified that the locally Noetherian hypothesis was on the target scheme. | |
| Oct 22, 2009 at 7:54 | history | edited | Andrew Critch | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
clarified which scheme is loc. noeth.
|
| Oct 22, 2009 at 7:45 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Oct 22, 2009 at 7:41 | history | edited | Andrew Critch | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 102 characters in body
|
| Oct 22, 2009 at 7:34 | history | answered | Andrew Critch | CC BY-SA 2.5 |