Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 11, 2014 at 0:06 vote accept Question Mark
Oct 10, 2014 at 23:12 answer added Jacob Lurie timeline score: 18
Oct 10, 2014 at 22:31 comment added Fernando Muro In case this helps, by standard group cohomology, the non-abelian central extensions of two abelian groups $A$ and $B$ are classified by $\hom(\wedge^2A,B)$, where $\wedge^2A$ is the quotient of $A\otimes A$ by the diagonal elements $a\otimes a$, $a\in A$. All this is about discrete groups, not algebraic groups.
Oct 10, 2014 at 20:55 comment added Question Mark I am a little worried that Oort may be considering only commutative extensions to begin with. At any rate, leafing through his book I couldn't find it, so a precise reference would be very helpful.
Oct 10, 2014 at 20:40 comment added Question Mark The latter (I thought this was standard notation), so it is a finite group scheme. In other words, $\alpha_p$ is the Frobenius kernel of $\mathbb{G}_a$. Could you give a more precise reference within LNM 15?
Oct 10, 2014 at 20:13 comment added anon What is $\alpha_p$? The additive group $\mathbb{G}_a$ or the finite group scheme with $\alpha_p(R)=\{a\in R|a^p=0\}$. If the latter, there are no nontrivial extensions, see Oort 1966, LNM 15.
Oct 10, 2014 at 19:36 comment added Question Mark OK, I've clarified this.
Oct 10, 2014 at 19:32 history edited Question Mark CC BY-SA 3.0
added 150 characters in body
Oct 10, 2014 at 19:04 comment added R.P. Actually, I know of no serious source that uses that phrase to mean an extension of the form $0 \rightarrow A \rightarrow E \rightarrow B \rightarrow 0$, but I would love to be shown an example.
Oct 10, 2014 at 18:23 comment added Matthias Wendt Could you please specify in the question which way the extension goes? The terminology "extension of A by B" is somewhat ambiguous.
Oct 10, 2014 at 17:56 history asked Question Mark CC BY-SA 3.0