Skip to main content
added 9 characters in body
Source Link
Amritanshu Prasad
  • 5.7k
  • 1
  • 38
  • 54

According to Djokovic and Maizan, the Specht module $V_{(3, 1, 1)}$ of $S_5$ is monomial. This is a representation of dimension $6$, induced from a representation of dimension $3$ of $A_5$. Since $A_5$ has no subgroup of index $3$ (see here for example), this representation of $A_5$ cannot be monomial.

According to Djokovic and Maizan, the Specht module $V_{(3, 1, 1)}$ of $S_5$ is monomial. This is a representation of dimension $6$, induced from a representation of dimension $3$ of $A_5$. Since $A_5$ has no subgroup of index $3$ (see here for example), this representation cannot be monomial.

According to Djokovic and Maizan, the Specht module $V_{(3, 1, 1)}$ of $S_5$ is monomial. This is a representation of dimension $6$, induced from a representation of dimension $3$ of $A_5$. Since $A_5$ has no subgroup of index $3$ (see here for example), this representation of $A_5$ cannot be monomial.

Source Link
Amritanshu Prasad
  • 5.7k
  • 1
  • 38
  • 54

According to Djokovic and Maizan, the Specht module $V_{(3, 1, 1)}$ of $S_5$ is monomial. This is a representation of dimension $6$, induced from a representation of dimension $3$ of $A_5$. Since $A_5$ has no subgroup of index $3$ (see here for example), this representation cannot be monomial.