Timeline for Decompose a big divisor as nef big divisor and effective divisor
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 10, 2014 at 3:29 | history | edited | aegbert | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 84 characters in body
|
Oct 10, 2014 at 3:22 | history | edited | aegbert | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 65 characters in body
|
Oct 10, 2014 at 2:51 | history | edited | aegbert | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 20 characters in body
|
Oct 10, 2014 at 2:27 | history | edited | aegbert | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 74 characters in body
|
Oct 10, 2014 at 0:45 | comment | added | user47305 | Does such $m$ even exist on a fixed variety $X$? I don't see that it's even true that there exists a constant $m = m(X)$ such that $h^0(mD) > 0$ if $D$ is big and Cartier on $X$; for $h^0(mD-A)$ it's even worse. I doubt a sequence of such $D$ is going to have the decompositions you want. | |
Oct 9, 2014 at 15:37 | comment | added | Li Yutong | No, because I need $m$ does not depend on particular choice of $X$. Even in simpler case, where $D$ itself is Cartier, using the proof of Kodaira lemma (just as you did), I do not know if there is a universal $m$ such that $h^0(mD -A)$ is non-vanishing (where $A$ is an ample divisor). | |
Oct 9, 2014 at 15:16 | history | answered | aegbert | CC BY-SA 3.0 |