Skip to main content
57 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 28, 2021 at 9:06 answer added Ben McKay timeline score: 2
Jul 17, 2020 at 23:52 answer added R. van Dobben de Bruyn timeline score: 7
Jul 17, 2020 at 22:12 answer added Ho Man-Ho timeline score: 2
Dec 28, 2018 at 14:38 answer added kjetil b halvorsen timeline score: 0
Dec 28, 2018 at 14:21 comment added kjetil b halvorsen @The Mathemagician: "Sometimes low-tech is good" See lowtechmagazine
Dec 22, 2018 at 18:33 answer added user90041 timeline score: 1
Dec 9, 2017 at 0:18 review Close votes
Dec 9, 2017 at 10:24
Jul 9, 2017 at 13:00 answer added Gerry Myerson timeline score: 2
Jul 9, 2017 at 3:52 answer added Phil Harmsworth timeline score: 2
Feb 12, 2014 at 15:11 answer added Dominik Kwietniak timeline score: 4
Feb 20, 2012 at 18:10 answer added Kiu timeline score: 2
Feb 20, 2012 at 14:22 answer added David White timeline score: 3
Feb 19, 2012 at 16:59 answer added Saikat Biswas timeline score: 5
Feb 19, 2012 at 9:38 answer added zapkm timeline score: 3
Feb 19, 2012 at 9:33 answer added yaa09d timeline score: 2
Jan 21, 2012 at 19:33 comment added Michael Lugo See also math.stackexchange.com/questions/101077/out-of-print-textbooks , which was just posted.
Sep 5, 2011 at 20:44 answer added John mac timeline score: 2
Sep 17, 2010 at 0:23 answer added Daniel Miller timeline score: 4
Sep 16, 2010 at 22:44 comment added Charles Staats Suggestion: If you see a book listed that is in print, perhaps you should make a note of this (by editing or commenting) but leave it so that people who thought the book was out of print may be pleasantly surprised.
Sep 16, 2010 at 22:39 answer added Charles Staats timeline score: 7
Jul 6, 2010 at 8:51 answer added L. J. P. Kilford timeline score: 6
May 21, 2010 at 17:57 answer added hypercube timeline score: 9
May 12, 2010 at 2:49 answer added Pete L. Clark timeline score: 5
May 11, 2010 at 18:18 answer added Zsbán Ambrus timeline score: 1
May 7, 2010 at 9:15 answer added Colin Pratt timeline score: 4
Apr 4, 2010 at 16:13 answer added Botong Wang timeline score: 4
Mar 26, 2010 at 23:36 answer added Wanderer timeline score: 3
Mar 26, 2010 at 18:16 answer added Sam Lewallen timeline score: 3
Mar 26, 2010 at 5:47 answer added Sean Tilson timeline score: 5
Mar 25, 2010 at 20:55 answer added Johannes Wachs timeline score: 1
Mar 25, 2010 at 1:59 answer added MBN timeline score: 5
Mar 24, 2010 at 23:04 answer added Charlie Frohman timeline score: 9
Mar 24, 2010 at 20:42 answer added Sean Rostami timeline score: 10
Mar 18, 2010 at 20:23 comment added Jonas Meyer Oh, I see that you mistook me for the person who wrote those words. "Ownership" of a post can sometimes be confusing, especially in community wiki. I made a couple of minor edits to the post by Martin Bright. Click to the right of the word "edited" above to see the details, and notice that in the bottom right of the question Martin Bright's name appears. Anyway, Martin Bright was merely exaggerating, but if you are correct about the popularity of real books among young students, then I am glad. No one here has disputed the goodness of low-tech.
Mar 18, 2010 at 20:13 comment added The Mathemagician Jonas,I quote: "Perhaps nobody under 30 actually reads real books made from trees any more, but personally I find it more convenient to refer to a paper copy, to the extent that I will happily buy a copy of something which is available free on-line (like SGA 1 and 2, or Milne's Arithmetic Duality Theorems)."End quote.I know how you feel on the issue-just telling you people are coming back to old fashioned paper because of the drawbacks to the high tech approach as it currently stands.Which is good news for us all.
Mar 18, 2010 at 19:31 comment added Jonas Meyer You differ with me on what, Andrew L? I have no idea what you're talking about. I love real books.
Mar 18, 2010 at 18:50 answer added The Mathemagician timeline score: 9
Mar 18, 2010 at 18:39 comment added The Mathemagician Uh,I beg to differ,Jonas. Young students are starting to burn out thier eyes and get migraines reading too much from a quartz screen.So they're starting to not only go back to paper books,but requesting titles from wise old self-studiers like me. Sometimes low-tech is good.
Mar 16, 2010 at 9:55 comment added Martin Bright Great, Néron models does indeed seem to be in print now. I should have checked before posting.
Mar 16, 2010 at 1:38 comment added Jonas Meyer I removed Néron models because it appears to be in print, as AS pointed out.
Mar 16, 2010 at 1:37 history edited Jonas Meyer CC BY-SA 2.5
Néron models is in print as AS pointed out; deleted 2 characters in body
Mar 16, 2010 at 0:19 answer added Ilya Grigoriev timeline score: 5
Mar 15, 2010 at 20:10 comment added Leah Wrenn Berman I was going to say Grunbaum & Shephard, Tilings and Patterns, but it turns out it's being re-issued---in paperback, no less---later this year. I love dover books.
Mar 15, 2010 at 20:08 answer added user1437 timeline score: 7
Mar 15, 2010 at 19:42 answer added Keenan Kidwell timeline score: 5
Mar 15, 2010 at 19:33 answer added Jonas Meyer timeline score: 8
Mar 15, 2010 at 18:46 answer added David Steinberg timeline score: 3
Mar 15, 2010 at 18:36 answer added user717 timeline score: 14
Mar 15, 2010 at 17:50 history edited Jonas Meyer
edited tags
Mar 15, 2010 at 17:25 comment added Wanderer Néron models is in this year's Springer Yellow Sale?
Mar 15, 2010 at 15:26 comment added Tom Leinster Reprints in Theory and Applications of Categories (tac.mta.ca/tac/reprints) makes it its business to reprint out-of-print books in category theory. At least five books, plus a bunch of classic but hard-to-get-hold-of papers, have appeared so far. If you have suggestions, contact me or another editor.
Mar 15, 2010 at 15:05 answer added Steven Gubkin timeline score: 28
Mar 15, 2010 at 14:59 comment added Martin Bright If there are any reading, maybe they will take note...
Mar 15, 2010 at 14:59 answer added Mark Meckes timeline score: 10
Mar 15, 2010 at 14:50 comment added Sunni Is this a questionaire by booksellers.
Mar 15, 2010 at 14:47 answer added Cam McLeman timeline score: 11
Mar 15, 2010 at 14:40 history asked Martin Bright CC BY-SA 2.5