Timeline for Strings and "co-subsequences"
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2013 at 3:56 | history | edited | JRN |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 26, 2010 at 9:10 | vote | accept | Anthony Labarre | ||
| Mar 15, 2010 at 23:24 | answer | added | mathy | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 15, 2010 at 23:23 | answer | added | Joel David Hamkins | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 15, 2010 at 13:40 | answer | added | Amy Glen | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 15, 2010 at 12:30 | answer | added | Joseph Malkevitch | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 15, 2010 at 11:02 | history | edited | Anthony Labarre | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
swapped substring and subsequence
|
| Mar 15, 2010 at 10:58 | comment | added | Anthony Labarre | You're absolutely right, I should have been more careful. I'm editing this right now to fix that. | |
| Mar 15, 2010 at 10:40 | comment | added | rgrig | Actually, I always thought the standard use is to say 'substring' for contiguous parts and 'subsequence' for not necessarily contiguous parts. | |
| Mar 15, 2010 at 9:14 | answer | added | Tomaž Pisanski | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 15, 2010 at 8:42 | history | asked | Anthony Labarre | CC BY-SA 2.5 |