Timeline for Simplifying the definition of a geometric context using sieves?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2014 at 12:55 | history | edited | user9072 |
edited tags
|
|
| Oct 18, 2010 at 4:11 | vote | accept | Harry Gindi | ||
| Mar 15, 2010 at 8:01 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | I agree. I was just trying to head off any complaints. | |
| Mar 15, 2010 at 7:49 | comment | added | BCnrd | Math French is not real French; anyone who intends to go into this kind of algebraic geometry should sit down and learn this kind of French. It takes only a little bit of practice (e.g., comparing English and French versions of a book by Serre, and learning perhaps 30 more words). Reading even a menu in French is harder than reading this kind of French. | |
| Mar 15, 2010 at 7:38 | answer | added | BCnrd | timeline score: 9 | |
| Mar 15, 2010 at 6:14 | history | edited | Harry Gindi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 95 characters in body; added 117 characters in body; added 21 characters in body
|
| Mar 15, 2010 at 6:10 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | I just realized that having the axioms in French may be annoying to some of you, so I'll try to come back a little later and reproduce them in English here, but I'm very busy at the moment. | |
| Mar 15, 2010 at 5:59 | comment | added | JBorger | I agree that someone should get to the category-theoretic bottom of all this (whether or not sieves are the best formal device to use). | |
| Mar 15, 2010 at 5:49 | history | asked | Harry Gindi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |