Timeline for scott continuity, sub additivity
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2014 at 7:25 | answer | added | Dominic van der Zypen | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 1, 2014 at 21:51 | comment | added | Włodzimierz Holsztyński | I feel that there are some random errors in the formulation of the above Question. Is it really possible that just one single equality $f(\sqcup_x X) = \sqcup_y f(x), x \in X$ would be enough to define continuity? Or is there a typo? I have also other doubts, more conceptual. Non-equivalent continuity notions should be perhaps in a complex correspondence to different closure operations. However, you have only a single notion of Scott continuity. If my doubts are founded you need to reformulate your question so that it will make sense. | |
| Oct 1, 2014 at 21:14 | answer | added | Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 1, 2014 at 19:22 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 1, 2014 at 19:24 | |||||
| Oct 1, 2014 at 19:16 | history | asked | accio | CC BY-SA 3.0 |