Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Answer

Added doi link
Source Link
David Roberts ♦
David Roberts ♦
  • 35.4k
  • 11
  • 124
  • 349

There is another branch of the TVS theory, which is not dead at all. It deals with TVS over non-Archimedean fields. See

C. Perez-Garcia and W. H. Schikhof, Locally Convex Spaces over Non-Archimedean Valued FieldsLocally Convex Spaces over Non-Archimedean Valued Fields, Cambridge University Press, 2010. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511729959

There is another branch of the TVS theory, which is not dead at all. It deals with TVS over non-Archimedean fields. See

C. Perez-Garcia and W. H. Schikhof, Locally Convex Spaces over Non-Archimedean Valued Fields, Cambridge University Press, 2010.

There is another branch of the TVS theory, which is not dead at all. It deals with TVS over non-Archimedean fields. See

C. Perez-Garcia and W. H. Schikhof, Locally Convex Spaces over Non-Archimedean Valued Fields, Cambridge University Press, 2010. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511729959

Source Link
Anatoly Kochubei
Anatoly Kochubei
  • 4.9k
  • 1
  • 27
  • 23

There is another branch of the TVS theory, which is not dead at all. It deals with TVS over non-Archimedean fields. See

C. Perez-Garcia and W. H. Schikhof, Locally Convex Spaces over Non-Archimedean Valued Fields, Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Post Made Community Wiki by Anatoly Kochubei