Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 14, 2014 at 14:18 comment added Martin Brandenburg Meanwhile I have also found a proof for $X \cong G(F(X))$.
Oct 14, 2014 at 6:53 history bounty ended Martin Brandenburg
Oct 14, 2014 at 6:53 vote accept Martin Brandenburg
Oct 13, 2014 at 14:19 comment added Neil Strickland I am happy for this to be made CW.
Oct 13, 2014 at 11:22 comment added Martin Brandenburg I think I have found a proof that $R \to F(G(R))$ is an isomorphism, but it's quite long. Should I make this a CW answer?
Oct 9, 2014 at 10:20 comment added Martin Brandenburg @EricWofsey: Yes, because then it is a closed subspace of $\prod_{r \in R} \mathbb{F}_4$. Notice that this is not a Zariski-like topology.
Oct 9, 2014 at 10:17 comment added Eric Wofsey @MartinBrandenburg: It is a Stone space if you topologize it based on $\mathbb{F}_4$ being discrete, rather than only $\{0\}$ being closed.
Oct 9, 2014 at 10:11 comment added Martin Brandenburg Unfortunately, $G(R)$ is not a Hausdorff space and not totally disconnected. For example, $G(\mathbb{F}_4)$ has two points and carries the indiscrete topology. Nevertheless, we can ask if $R \to \mathrm{Map}_{C_2}(\hom(R,\mathbb{F}_4),\mathbb{F}_4)$ is an isomorphism. It is injective, but I have no idea how to prove surjectivity.
Oct 9, 2014 at 10:07 history edited Martin Brandenburg CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
Sep 27, 2014 at 18:39 comment added Martin Brandenburg Hm, $\mathcal{X}$ is equivalent to the category of boolean rings with an action of $C_2$. Is there a direct algebraic way to see that this is $\mathcal{R}$?
Sep 27, 2014 at 17:45 history answered Neil Strickland CC BY-SA 3.0