Skip to main content
Bumped by Community user
direct link instead of Google
Source Link
Martin Sleziak
  • 4.7k
  • 4
  • 35
  • 40

I've come across the following claim in a paperpaper of Mallat:

"High frequency instabilities [of a signal representation] to deformations can be avoided by grouping frequencies into dyadic packets in $\mathbb{R}^d$, with a wavelet transform."

I know what the wavelet packet decomposition is and I know what stability to deformations is (in the case of $C^2$ diffeomorphisms), but I don't understand why the quoted statement is true.

Perhaps I missed the explanation in the paper, but could someone provide a reference, an explanation or both? I assume it has something to do with the fact that a wavelet is localized.

1 Stéphane Mallat: Group Invariant Scattering, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. LXV, 1331–1398 (2012), DOI: 10.1002/cpa.21413

I've come across the following claim in a paper of Mallat:

"High frequency instabilities [of a signal representation] to deformations can be avoided by grouping frequencies into dyadic packets in $\mathbb{R}^d$, with a wavelet transform."

I know what the wavelet packet decomposition is and I know what stability to deformations is (in the case of $C^2$ diffeomorphisms), but I don't understand why the quoted statement is true.

Perhaps I missed the explanation in the paper, but could someone provide a reference, an explanation or both? I assume it has something to do with the fact that a wavelet is localized.

I've come across the following claim in a paper of Mallat:

"High frequency instabilities [of a signal representation] to deformations can be avoided by grouping frequencies into dyadic packets in $\mathbb{R}^d$, with a wavelet transform."

I know what the wavelet packet decomposition is and I know what stability to deformations is (in the case of $C^2$ diffeomorphisms), but I don't understand why the quoted statement is true.

Perhaps I missed the explanation in the paper, but could someone provide a reference, an explanation or both? I assume it has something to do with the fact that a wavelet is localized.

1 Stéphane Mallat: Group Invariant Scattering, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. LXV, 1331–1398 (2012), DOI: 10.1002/cpa.21413

Bumped by Community user
Included reference
Source Link
MRicci
  • 131
  • 2

I've come across the following claim in a paperpaper of Mallat:

"High frequency instabilities [of a signal representation] to deformations can be avoided by grouping frequencies into dyadic packets in $\mathbb{R}^d$, with a wavelet transform."

I know what the wavelet packet decomposition is and I know what stability to deformations is (in the case of $C^2$ diffeomorphisms), but I don't understand why the quoted statement is true.

CouldPerhaps I missed the explanation in the paper, but could someone provide a reference, an explanation or both? I assume it has something to do with the fact that a wavelet is localized.

I've come across the following claim in a paper:

"High frequency instabilities [of a signal representation] to deformations can be avoided by grouping frequencies into dyadic packets in $\mathbb{R}^d$, with a wavelet transform."

I know what the wavelet packet decomposition is and I know what stability to deformations is (in the case of $C^2$ diffeomorphisms), but I don't understand why the quoted statement is true.

Could someone provide a reference, an explanation or both?

I've come across the following claim in a paper of Mallat:

"High frequency instabilities [of a signal representation] to deformations can be avoided by grouping frequencies into dyadic packets in $\mathbb{R}^d$, with a wavelet transform."

I know what the wavelet packet decomposition is and I know what stability to deformations is (in the case of $C^2$ diffeomorphisms), but I don't understand why the quoted statement is true.

Perhaps I missed the explanation in the paper, but could someone provide a reference, an explanation or both? I assume it has something to do with the fact that a wavelet is localized.

Source Link
MRicci
  • 131
  • 2

Wavelet transform stability to deformations

I've come across the following claim in a paper:

"High frequency instabilities [of a signal representation] to deformations can be avoided by grouping frequencies into dyadic packets in $\mathbb{R}^d$, with a wavelet transform."

I know what the wavelet packet decomposition is and I know what stability to deformations is (in the case of $C^2$ diffeomorphisms), but I don't understand why the quoted statement is true.

Could someone provide a reference, an explanation or both?