Timeline for Tannakian formalism for topological Hopf algebras
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2017 at 22:46 | vote | accept | Sinan Yalin | ||
| Apr 8, 2017 at 12:53 | answer | added | Anton Lyubinin | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 2, 2014 at 16:23 | comment | added | Dimitri Chikhladze | Some related stuff can be found in a paper by Joyal and Street maths.mq.edu.au/~street/CT90Como.pdf | |
| Sep 30, 2014 at 10:18 | comment | added | Sinan Yalin | I was thinking for instance about smooth functions on a compact group, or more generally smooth functions on a compact monoid in the category of smooth manifolds, which form, if I'm not mistaken, a bialgebra in the category of Frechet spaces with the projective tensor product. | |
| Sep 30, 2014 at 0:56 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | This might not be relevant to the categories you care about, but when people try to look at Hopf von Neumann algebras one has to use a different tensor product for the codomain of the comultiplication. So when you speak of Hopf algebras in the category of Banach spaces with its usual SMC structure, which examples do you have in mind? | |
| Sep 26, 2014 at 9:15 | comment | added | zibadawa timmy | See ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Tannaka+duality . It works for any monoid in nice enough categories. I do not know enough about the particular categories you want to know if they are well behaved enough for the usual arguments to carry through. | |
| Sep 25, 2014 at 21:27 | history | edited | Sinan Yalin |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 25, 2014 at 19:24 | history | asked | Sinan Yalin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |