Timeline for Holder regularity for the heat potentials
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2014 at 11:49 | vote | accept | foo90 | ||
| Oct 7, 2014 at 11:46 | history | edited | foo90 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Sep 24, 2014 at 13:07 | vote | accept | foo90 | ||
| Oct 14, 2014 at 11:49 | |||||
| Sep 23, 2014 at 12:57 | history | edited | foo90 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Sep 23, 2014 at 12:49 | comment | added | foo90 | You're right, i think that the density $\varphi$ must stay in $C^{1+\alpha/2,2+\alpha}(\partial\Omega\times[0,T])$ | |
| Sep 23, 2014 at 12:45 | answer | added | Andrew | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 23, 2014 at 12:33 | comment | added | Andrew | You take $\varphi\in C^{1+\alpha/2,2+\alpha}(Q)$ but densities should be defined on $\partial\Omega\times[0,T]$. Does it means that the trace of $\varphi$ is taken? | |
| Sep 23, 2014 at 11:11 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 23, 2014 at 11:21 | |||||
| Sep 23, 2014 at 11:10 | history | asked | foo90 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |