Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Apr 25, 2010 at 0:58 comment added JBorger Yeah, I think that's an excellent general remark. For quotients in sheaf theory, maps out and maps in are not so far apart. I wonder if this is in some sense part of the reason why sheaf theory is such a useful formalism.
Apr 25, 2010 at 0:48 comment added BCnrd Jim, how about this: we often need to study the "points" of a coset space $G/H$ (valued in various rings, like interesting fields), and sometimes do so by working etale-locally or fppf-locally and lifting to points of $G$. The lifting step involves the viewpoint of the quotient sheafification by which $G/H$ is characterized by maps out of it (whereas the "points" considered above involve maps into $G/H$). And likewise in many other quotient situations (for algebraic spaces, sheaves of various sorts, etc.)
Apr 24, 2010 at 22:06 answer added JBorger timeline score: 0
Apr 24, 2010 at 16:40 answer added S. Carnahan timeline score: 4
Apr 19, 2010 at 22:59 answer added Martin Brandenburg timeline score: 0
Mar 14, 2010 at 11:29 comment added Regenbogen If you have such a theorem, then by Yoneda, you can anyway express it in terms of properties of $Hom(_,X)$.
Mar 14, 2010 at 7:19 history asked JBorger CC BY-SA 2.5