Skip to main content
36 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Nov 14, 2014 at 3:07 history bounty ended Minimus Heximus
S Nov 14, 2014 at 3:07 history notice removed Minimus Heximus
Nov 12, 2014 at 3:18 history edited Minimus Heximus CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 1086 characters in body
Nov 10, 2014 at 19:33 vote accept Minimus Heximus
Nov 8, 2014 at 21:01 comment added Minimus Heximus @AndreasThom: I am working on some generalization of group topologies which I call f-subgroups. the lattice of f-subgoups is not distributive on any non-locally-cyclic group. This is a counterexample for locally cyclic case. I can investigate more deeply which groups allow distributive lattices.
Nov 8, 2014 at 20:48 comment added Andreas Thom Where does the question come from?
Nov 8, 2014 at 18:43 answer added Andreas Thom timeline score: 15
Nov 7, 2014 at 1:23 history edited Minimus Heximus CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
S Nov 7, 2014 at 1:04 history bounty started Minimus Heximus
S Nov 7, 2014 at 1:04 history notice added Minimus Heximus Reward existing answer
Nov 7, 2014 at 1:03 history undeleted Minimus Heximus
Nov 7, 2014 at 0:54 history deleted Minimus Heximus via Vote
Oct 5, 2014 at 15:55 history edited Minimus Heximus CC BY-SA 3.0
added 29 characters in body
Oct 5, 2014 at 12:33 history edited Minimus Heximus CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 5 characters in body
Oct 5, 2014 at 12:24 history edited Minimus Heximus CC BY-SA 3.0
added 5 characters in body
Oct 5, 2014 at 11:06 history edited Minimus Heximus CC BY-SA 3.0
added 316 characters in body
Oct 4, 2014 at 21:05 history undeleted Minimus Heximus
Oct 4, 2014 at 20:45 history deleted Minimus Heximus via Vote
S Oct 4, 2014 at 20:38 history bounty ended CommunityBot
S Oct 4, 2014 at 20:38 history notice removed CommunityBot
Oct 2, 2014 at 13:36 history edited Minimus Heximus CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 3 characters in body
Sep 27, 2014 at 13:17 history edited Minimus Heximus CC BY-SA 3.0
added 16 characters in body
Sep 26, 2014 at 21:31 history edited Minimus Heximus CC BY-SA 3.0
added 4 characters in body
S Sep 26, 2014 at 18:45 history bounty started Minimus Heximus
S Sep 26, 2014 at 18:45 history notice added Minimus Heximus Canonical answer required
Sep 26, 2014 at 16:23 comment added Sebastien Palcoux "something in the structure of $\mathbb{Z}$ other than abelianness, must be used to prove distributivity": Yes, perhaps the distributivity of its subgroups lattice. More generally (Ore's theorem) a group is locally cyclic iff its subgroups lattice is distributive (see a proof here)
Sep 26, 2014 at 10:32 history edited Minimus Heximus CC BY-SA 3.0
added 679 characters in body
Sep 26, 2014 at 10:24 history edited Minimus Heximus CC BY-SA 3.0
added 679 characters in body
Sep 25, 2014 at 15:37 comment added Sebastien Palcoux There is also this result of Lukacs-Palfy: a group $G$ is abelian iff the subgroups lattice of $G \times G$ is modular (see a proof here).
Sep 17, 2014 at 7:41 comment added Dominic van der Zypen Note that $(\mathcal{L}, \subseteq)$ is distributive if and only if the lattice $M_3$ ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributive_lattice#mediaviewer/… ) cannot be embedded in $(\mathcal{L}, \subseteq)$. So one idea might be to find three group topologies $\tau_1,\tau_2,\tau_3$ with identical infimum and identical supremum, or show that this cannot be done.
Sep 12, 2014 at 15:45 comment added Minimus Heximus A group topology on a group $G$ is a topology $\mathcal T$ on the set $G$ with which $(G,\mathcal T)$ is a topological group, that is, the function $(x,y)\mapsto xy^{-1}$ is continuous.
Sep 12, 2014 at 15:42 comment added The Masked Avenger What is a group topology on Z? Can it be isomorphic to a group topology on Q? On Z_p?
Sep 12, 2014 at 9:51 history edited Minimus Heximus CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 24 characters in body
Sep 12, 2014 at 7:59 history edited Minimus Heximus
edited tags
Sep 11, 2014 at 21:02 history edited Minimus Heximus
edited tags
Sep 11, 2014 at 16:18 history asked Minimus Heximus CC BY-SA 3.0