Timeline for Why is the Hochschild homology of k[t] just k[t] in degrees 0 and 1?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2022 at 22:51 | history | edited | David Roberts♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed arxiv front-end link, gave title
|
| Oct 7, 2009 at 20:07 | comment | added | Ben Webster♦ | Well, depth is a strange concept. I mean, certainly this is for me the more interesting answer, but I'm not sure to what degree it's "really about" Hochschild homology. Anyways, I'm glad I put both. | |
| Oct 7, 2009 at 19:56 | comment | added | Ilya Nikokoshev | I think this is the "deeper" explanation. Some directions where one might go from there even deeper, I believe, is in arxiv.org/abs/0706.0322 (which I'll be happy to discuss) | |
| Oct 7, 2009 at 19:48 | history | answered | Ben Webster♦ | CC BY-SA 2.5 |