Skip to main content
Added a discussion of the general setting.
Source Link
Nick Gill
  • 11.2k
  • 40
  • 70

The answer is NO for $G=SL_n(p)$$G=\mathrm{SL}_n(p)$ with $p$ fixed and $n\to\infty$. The bound you give - $(\log|G|)^c$ - requires an action of $G$ on a set of a size that is polynomial in $n$. But all the actions of $G$ have order exponential in $n$ - see, for instance Section 5 of Kleidman and Liebeck's book. I have an e-copy of this book if you want me to email it...

Added later: In fact the answer No generalizes: Let $G_r(p^a)$ be any finite group of Lie type of rank $r$ with level ($\approx$ field size) $p^a$. We can send any of the parameters $p,r$ or $a$ to infinity but in every case we find that $G$ does not have ANY actions small enough to satisfy the given bound (never mind also satisfying the requirement on the action of subgroups).

This is because $|G|\sim q^{f(r)}$ while any action of $G$ has degree bounded below by $q^{g(r)}$. Here $f$ is quadratic and $g$ is linear.

  • Fixing $p,a$ with $r\to\infty$ we would need an action of size polynomial in $r$, but any action is exponential in $r$;
  • Fixing $p,r$ with $a\to\infty$ we would need an action of size polynomial in $a$, but any action is exponential in $a$;
  • Fixing $a,r$ with $p\to\infty$ we would need an action of size polynomial in $\log(p)$ but any action is polynomial in $p$.

Final remark: It's possible that one can conclude the same result (i.e. characterizing alternating groups amongst simple group by the existence of an action on a small set) without using the Classification of Finite Simple Groups. There are some famous results in this direction - due to Babai and Pyber separately - where they give upper bounds on the size of primitive groups in terms of the degree of the action. They are not quite strong enough to yield the required conclusion here, because their bounds are exponential in the degree. The reason for this is that they consider arbitrary primitive groups and, in this case, wreath products acting in the product action are of such a size. It might be possible to adapt their arguments with the added supposition that the group $G$ is simple and obtain a bound something like $|G|\preceq n^{\log(n)}$ (where $n$ is the degree) which, I think, would be enough. My feeling is that such a result would be pretty big news though...

The answer is NO for $G=SL_n(p)$ with $p$ fixed and $n\to\infty$. The bound you give - $(\log|G|)^c$ - requires an action of $G$ on a set of a size that is polynomial in $n$. But all the actions of $G$ have order exponential in $n$ - see, for instance Section 5 of Kleidman and Liebeck's book. I have an e-copy of this book if you want me to email it...

The answer is NO for $G=\mathrm{SL}_n(p)$ with $p$ fixed and $n\to\infty$. The bound you give - $(\log|G|)^c$ - requires an action of $G$ on a set of a size that is polynomial in $n$. But all the actions of $G$ have order exponential in $n$ - see, for instance Section 5 of Kleidman and Liebeck's book. I have an e-copy of this book if you want me to email it...

Added later: In fact the answer No generalizes: Let $G_r(p^a)$ be any finite group of Lie type of rank $r$ with level ($\approx$ field size) $p^a$. We can send any of the parameters $p,r$ or $a$ to infinity but in every case we find that $G$ does not have ANY actions small enough to satisfy the given bound (never mind also satisfying the requirement on the action of subgroups).

This is because $|G|\sim q^{f(r)}$ while any action of $G$ has degree bounded below by $q^{g(r)}$. Here $f$ is quadratic and $g$ is linear.

  • Fixing $p,a$ with $r\to\infty$ we would need an action of size polynomial in $r$, but any action is exponential in $r$;
  • Fixing $p,r$ with $a\to\infty$ we would need an action of size polynomial in $a$, but any action is exponential in $a$;
  • Fixing $a,r$ with $p\to\infty$ we would need an action of size polynomial in $\log(p)$ but any action is polynomial in $p$.

Final remark: It's possible that one can conclude the same result (i.e. characterizing alternating groups amongst simple group by the existence of an action on a small set) without using the Classification of Finite Simple Groups. There are some famous results in this direction - due to Babai and Pyber separately - where they give upper bounds on the size of primitive groups in terms of the degree of the action. They are not quite strong enough to yield the required conclusion here, because their bounds are exponential in the degree. The reason for this is that they consider arbitrary primitive groups and, in this case, wreath products acting in the product action are of such a size. It might be possible to adapt their arguments with the added supposition that the group $G$ is simple and obtain a bound something like $|G|\preceq n^{\log(n)}$ (where $n$ is the degree) which, I think, would be enough. My feeling is that such a result would be pretty big news though...

Source Link
Nick Gill
  • 11.2k
  • 40
  • 70

The answer is NO for $G=SL_n(p)$ with $p$ fixed and $n\to\infty$. The bound you give - $(\log|G|)^c$ - requires an action of $G$ on a set of a size that is polynomial in $n$. But all the actions of $G$ have order exponential in $n$ - see, for instance Section 5 of Kleidman and Liebeck's book. I have an e-copy of this book if you want me to email it...