Timeline for A question on BSD conjecture
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2014 at 11:18 | comment | added | user57657 | You are right. I chase the proofs of Milne in jmilne.org/math/articles/1972a.pdf and "Arithmetic duality theorem". The two invariances are proved by comparing each ingredient one by one. So the equivalence on $p$-part should holds. | |
| Aug 31, 2014 at 11:04 | comment | added | Daniel Loughran | Im guessing the answer is probably yes here, though I don't know references. I would recommend examining the proofs of invariance of BSD under Weil restriction and isogeny, and see if they can be adapted to this setting. | |
| Aug 31, 2014 at 10:43 | comment | added | user57657 | Thanks. In a lot of cases, we know that the $p$-part of full BSD of $E$ and the quadratic twist of $E$ holds, by Skinner et. all. So what is the answer if we focus the question on the $p$-part of full BSD conjecture? | |
| Aug 31, 2014 at 10:27 | history | answered | Daniel Loughran | CC BY-SA 3.0 |