Skip to main content
50 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 16, 2014 at 15:14 comment added GH from MO @KierenMacMillan: Mail sent!
Dec 16, 2014 at 14:04 comment added Kieren MacMillan @GHfromMO: I'd appreciate it if you could email me your results (see my profile for address). Thanks!
Dec 10, 2014 at 7:50 comment added GH from MO @KierenMacMillan: Sorry, I got busy with other things and the remote computers I used were rebooted regularly, so I stopped checking. I covered all $\ell<2.1\times 10^{12}$ though, and found no counterexample. In this range, I recorded all triples $(\ell,m,m/\ell)$ with $\ell^2\mid m^3-2$ and $m/\ell<50$. I found 421 such triples, and among them the fractions $m/\ell$ distribute very uniformly: if we order these by size in Excel, their histogram is almost a perfect line. So all the empirical and theoretical evidence suggests that there is a counterexample, but I did not find one.
Dec 10, 2014 at 0:06 comment added Kieren MacMillan @GHfromMO: Just checking in on progress. Would love to see whatever data you've already got, etc.
Sep 6, 2014 at 4:24 comment added GH from MO I have checked all $\ell<10^{12}$ by distributing the task between many machines. This is quite a big range. I will continue the search for another week, month, or year (depending when I get tired), and I will post a summary then. At the moment all I can say is that the data is in good agreement with Lucia's heuristic.
Sep 5, 2014 at 23:58 comment added Kieren MacMillan Are there any updates? Have you reached a technical limit on the search for counterexamples?
Sep 5, 2014 at 12:26 history edited GH from MO CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
Aug 27, 2014 at 10:28 history edited GH from MO CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 10 characters in body
Aug 26, 2014 at 13:19 history edited GH from MO CC BY-SA 3.0
added 201 characters in body
Aug 26, 2014 at 13:14 comment added GH from MO @KierenMacMillan: Yes, this is why I kept the previous example of $0.485$ as well.
Aug 26, 2014 at 13:13 comment added GH from MO @Joël: Thanks for your comment. I will update the text accordingly.
Aug 26, 2014 at 13:07 comment added Kieren MacMillan Note that the $\approx 0.350$ example doesn't have $\ell,m$ odd, so it's not a candidate. The hypothetical counterexample record still stands at $\approx 0.485$.
Aug 26, 2014 at 12:59 comment added Joël 0.350... You're getting close! But you should consider writing explicitly in your answer, near the numerical examples, that an example with $m/l < 0.333$ would be a counter-example to the original OP's conjecture. Right now a new reader has to read carefully Lucia's answer or the comment on yours to find this information.
Aug 26, 2014 at 12:47 history edited GH from MO CC BY-SA 3.0
added 6 characters in body
Aug 26, 2014 at 12:36 history edited GH from MO CC BY-SA 3.0
added 89 characters in body
Aug 26, 2014 at 3:42 history edited GH from MO CC BY-SA 3.0
added 8 characters in body
Aug 26, 2014 at 2:39 history edited GH from MO CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 7 characters in body
Aug 26, 2014 at 1:14 comment added GH from MO Consider the odd pairs $(\ell,m)$ satisfying $\ell^2\mid m^3-2$. Then the ratios $m/\ell$ are equidistributed in $(0,\infty)$ in a certain sense (I can be more specific if you wish). In particular, the ratios $m/\ell$ are dense in $(0,\infty)$, hence they are infinitely often smaller than $1/3$.
Aug 26, 2014 at 1:13 comment added GH from MO @KierenMacMillan: One counterexample does not tell much, beyond disproving your conjecture of course. Infinitely many counterexamples would tell that the abc conjecture cannot be strengthened in a certain way. At any rate, here is a conjecture that I believe is true and would yield infinitely many counterexamples to your conjecture (continued in next comment):
Aug 26, 2014 at 1:05 comment added Kieren MacMillan @GHfromMO: In your original answer, you suggested that the abc conjecture would imply a slightly weaker conjecture is “probably true”. If you find a counterexample to my stronger conjecture, what will that say??
Aug 26, 2014 at 1:02 history edited GH from MO CC BY-SA 3.0
added 142 characters in body
Aug 26, 2014 at 1:02 comment added Kieren MacMillan According to your original transformation, isn't $b=(\ell-m)/2$? And why do you think $k \approx b$?
Aug 26, 2014 at 0:25 comment added Lucia I think $k$ is a about size $b$, which is roughly $\ell-m$. Knowing that this is at least $5$ doesn't help, or hurt, the computations of GH from MO. In the notation of the original question, GH from MO's computations have disproved the conjecture if the condition had been $b<a<8b$.
Aug 26, 2014 at 0:09 comment added GH from MO @KierenMacMillan: Smaller ratios for $m/\ell$ are harder to find. Please do not change your conjecture to make it harder for us to disprove :-)
Aug 26, 2014 at 0:02 comment added Kieren MacMillan Well, for example, I think I could invert the current proof, and show that $k \ge 5$. So that would, I think, mean you're looking for a ratio $m/\ell \le 0.2$, yes? So your bound on $m$ for a given $\ell$ would be almost cut in half.
Aug 25, 2014 at 22:31 comment added GH from MO @KierenMacMillan: I don't know how to make use of any information on the quotient. What Noam's code does is: it cycles over $\ell$, and for each $\ell$ it finds the smallest $m$ such that $\ell^2\mid m^3-2$.
Aug 25, 2014 at 22:23 comment added Kieren MacMillan If I can push my algebraic proof a little further, I might be able to get a bound on the quotient $k$, which would help reduce [possibly significantly] the number of tests required.
Aug 25, 2014 at 21:26 comment added GH from MO @KierenMacMillan: Yes. I am sure it exists, but it might be as large as $10^{16}$, for which a supercomputer would be needed. I was already surprised by finding a pair with ratio $0.766$.
Aug 25, 2014 at 21:08 comment added Kieren MacMillan A counterexample would be $< 0.333...$, am I correct?
Aug 25, 2014 at 20:38 history edited GH from MO CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2 characters in body
Aug 25, 2014 at 20:34 comment added GH from MO Using your code, I found a new example with $\ell^2 \mid m^3 - 2$ and $\ell>m$: $(\ell,m)=(3230984317,2474621651)$. A pleasant feature is that $m$ is odd and $m/\ell\approx 0.766$ is significantly below $1$.
Aug 25, 2014 at 15:48 history edited GH from MO CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1 character in body
Aug 25, 2014 at 15:42 history edited GH from MO CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2 characters in body
Aug 25, 2014 at 14:43 comment added GH from MO @NoamD.Elkies: I am stretching your range with your program, in the hope of hitting a counterexample. See my added section. Perhaps you have access to faster computers.
Aug 25, 2014 at 14:40 history edited GH from MO CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1041 characters in body
Aug 25, 2014 at 8:48 history edited GH from MO CC BY-SA 3.0
added 80 characters in body
Aug 25, 2014 at 8:38 comment added GH from MO @NoamD.Elkies: Thank you for the code!
Aug 25, 2014 at 2:49 comment added Noam D. Elkies [The condition if(l%3, (i.e., don't try $\ell$ if $3\mid\ell$) exploits the fact that $x^3-2$ has no roots mod $3^2$. I could have also saved a factor of nearly $3/4$ by requiring that $\ell$ not be divisible by $7$, $13$, or $19$.]
Aug 25, 2014 at 2:46 comment added Noam D. Elkies OK, gp code follows, though I'm afraid the line breaks and indentations will be lost $-$ or is there a way to retain such formatting in comments? $$ $$ L = 10^8; { forstep(l=3,L,2, if(l%10^6==1,print("<",l-1,">")); if(l%3, F = factor(l); n = #F[,1]; v = vector(n,i,polrootspadic(x^3-2,F[i,1],2*F[i,2])); for(i=1,n, v[i] = lift(v[i]) * Mod(1,F[i,1]^(2*F[i,2]))); forvec(r=vector(n,i,[1,#v[i]]), m = Mod(0,1); for(i=1,n, m=chinese(m,v[i][r[i]])); m = lift(m); if(m<l,print([l,m])) ) ) ) }
Aug 25, 2014 at 1:58 history edited GH from MO CC BY-SA 3.0
added 61 characters in body
Aug 25, 2014 at 1:52 comment added GH from MO @NoamD.Elkies: This is a good idea, thank you! I am using a very simple 3-line code in SAGE, utilizing the function squarefree_part. Can you post your code, e.g. as part of a response here? I could learn from it as I am not at all familiar with gp.
Aug 25, 2014 at 0:59 comment added Noam D. Elkies It's faster to look for $\ell^2 \mid m^3 - 2$ via the factorization of $\ell$ rather than $m^3-2$. A 30 minute calulation in gp (using polrootspadic) finds that there are no examples of $m<\ell$ with $\ell$ odd and $0 < \ell < 10^8$ besides the known $(\ell,m) = (5,3)$ and $(127,100)$.
Aug 24, 2014 at 21:22 history edited GH from MO CC BY-SA 3.0
added 119 characters in body
Aug 24, 2014 at 20:23 comment added GH from MO @Lucia: Yes. Also, there are refinements of the abc conjecture that can make the $m^{2+\epsilon}$ bound more precise.
Aug 24, 2014 at 20:21 comment added Lucia Note that the heuristic I gave also suggests that apart from finitely many exceptions, the largest square factor of $m^3-2$ is at most $(m\log m)^2$, say. So this is certainly in a very delicate range!
Aug 24, 2014 at 20:04 comment added GH from MO $x\ll_\epsilon y$ means that there is a constant $c_\epsilon$ depending only on $\epsilon$ such that $|x|\leq c_\epsilon y$. Another notation for the same relation is $x=O_\epsilon(y)$.
Aug 24, 2014 at 20:02 comment added Kieren MacMillan Very interesting! I'm familiar with $\ll$ but not $\ll_\epsilon$. What is the meaning?
Aug 24, 2014 at 20:01 history edited GH from MO CC BY-SA 3.0
added 4 characters in body
Aug 24, 2014 at 19:39 history edited GH from MO CC BY-SA 3.0
added 4 characters in body
Aug 24, 2014 at 19:24 history answered GH from MO CC BY-SA 3.0