Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 13, 2010 at 22:25 vote accept Sergei Ivanov
Mar 13, 2010 at 18:37 answer added Anton Petrunin timeline score: 4
Mar 13, 2010 at 5:20 comment added Sergei Ivanov No, the only proof I know is via compactness theorem. I know nothing about mean curvature flow but foresee problems. How to deal with the boundary and with topological singularities?
Mar 12, 2010 at 18:32 comment added Anton Petrunin Did you try mean-curvature-flow? If yes (and if it works) what does it give you when $n$ grows?
Mar 12, 2010 at 5:04 comment added Sergei Ivanov Yes a surface may be singular, it is just a map from a manifold. If n is large enough, you can approximate everything by immersions if you really need. On the constructive side, it is easier to work with singular chains rather than surfaces.
Mar 12, 2010 at 0:38 comment added Johannes Hahn Okay, but there is still something wrong with this. If $S$ is not entirely above or below $D$ (more wave-like), then the gap between $S$ and $D$ is no manifold.
Mar 11, 2010 at 22:58 comment added Sergei Ivanov No, $S-D$ is not $S\setminus D$. It is the formal sum of $S$ and $-D$ where $-D$ is $D$ taken with the opposite orientation. As a set, it equals $S\cup D$ for a generic surface.
Mar 11, 2010 at 22:41 comment added Johannes Hahn Something's wrong with this "gap filling" stuff. Even in the easiest cases were $S$ is just a disc that has a small "dent" (say the surface {$(x,y,z) | x^2+y^2\leq 1, z=c\cdot(1-x^2+y^2)$}) the boundary of $F$ is $S\cup D$ not $S-D$.
Mar 11, 2010 at 22:29 history asked Sergei Ivanov CC BY-SA 2.5