Skip to main content
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Source Link

This question loosely builds on this onethis one, however is a bit simpler and I found the results to be more robust.

It seems that all zeros in the critical strip $0 \lt \Re(s) < 1$ of:

$$Li_s(z)\, \pm \, Li_{1-s}(z)$$

reside on the critical line $\Re(s)=\frac12$ for all $z \le -1$.

Below is a graph that shows where this function (using $\pm = -$) vanishes for $s=\frac12 \pm t\,i$ at different values of $z$. The lines marked in red all lead to a non-trivial zero of $\zeta(s)$, since $Li_s(-1)=\eta(s)$, with $\eta(s)$ being the Dirichlet Eta-function.

I have extended the graph towards $z \rightarrow 0^-$ to also show how some lines continue in that domain, however there clearly are zeros off the critical line when $z > -1$ (note: the lines coming from the left don't have a 'hard stop' at $z=-1$ and actually continue a short bit further to the right).

enter image description here

For the root finding process I used the following expression of the PolyLog function that I found to be evaluating much faster for higher values than the standard PolyLog function (in Maple):

$$Li_s(z) = \frac{\Gamma(1-s)}{(2\,\pi)^{1-s}} \left(i^{1-s}\,\zeta_H\left(1-s,\frac12+\frac{\ln(-z)}{2 \,\pi \, i}\right)+i^{s-1}\,\zeta_H\left(1-s,\frac12-\frac{\ln(-z)}{2 \,\pi \, i}\right)\right)$$

where $\zeta_H(s,q)$ is the Hurwitz zeta function.

Addition:

Numerical evidence suggests that the claim could be extended further into:

All complex zeros in the critical strip $0 \lt \Re(s) < 1$ of:

$$Li_s(z)\, \pm \, Li_{2a-s}(z)$$

reside on the critical line $\Re(s)=a$ for all $z \le -1$ and all $a \le \frac12$ (this might be related to this paper).

The patterns of lines of zeros at $s=a + t i$ are very similar to the graph above and values of $t$ only shift slightly at different $a$. However, the zeros at $z \rightarrow 0^-$ always remain $s=a \pm \frac{k \, \pi \, i}{\ln(2)},k \in \mathbb{N}$ and their imaginary part $t$ seems independent of the choice of $a$. This might be a clue for answering my second question (note that $2^s-2^{2a-s}$ has the same roots, however I did not find any connection).

Questions:

  1. Is there a counterexample with a zero lying off the critical line, but in the critical strip for $z \le -1$?

  2. When $z \rightarrow 0^-$ the function $Li_s(z)\, - \, Li_{1-s}(z)$ vanishes at $s=\frac12 \pm \frac{k \, \pi \, i}{\ln(2)}$ with $k \in \mathbb{N}$, however I failed to derive this apparently trivial result from the known formulae. Could this be proven?

Thanks.

This question loosely builds on this one, however is a bit simpler and I found the results to be more robust.

It seems that all zeros in the critical strip $0 \lt \Re(s) < 1$ of:

$$Li_s(z)\, \pm \, Li_{1-s}(z)$$

reside on the critical line $\Re(s)=\frac12$ for all $z \le -1$.

Below is a graph that shows where this function (using $\pm = -$) vanishes for $s=\frac12 \pm t\,i$ at different values of $z$. The lines marked in red all lead to a non-trivial zero of $\zeta(s)$, since $Li_s(-1)=\eta(s)$, with $\eta(s)$ being the Dirichlet Eta-function.

I have extended the graph towards $z \rightarrow 0^-$ to also show how some lines continue in that domain, however there clearly are zeros off the critical line when $z > -1$ (note: the lines coming from the left don't have a 'hard stop' at $z=-1$ and actually continue a short bit further to the right).

enter image description here

For the root finding process I used the following expression of the PolyLog function that I found to be evaluating much faster for higher values than the standard PolyLog function (in Maple):

$$Li_s(z) = \frac{\Gamma(1-s)}{(2\,\pi)^{1-s}} \left(i^{1-s}\,\zeta_H\left(1-s,\frac12+\frac{\ln(-z)}{2 \,\pi \, i}\right)+i^{s-1}\,\zeta_H\left(1-s,\frac12-\frac{\ln(-z)}{2 \,\pi \, i}\right)\right)$$

where $\zeta_H(s,q)$ is the Hurwitz zeta function.

Addition:

Numerical evidence suggests that the claim could be extended further into:

All complex zeros in the critical strip $0 \lt \Re(s) < 1$ of:

$$Li_s(z)\, \pm \, Li_{2a-s}(z)$$

reside on the critical line $\Re(s)=a$ for all $z \le -1$ and all $a \le \frac12$ (this might be related to this paper).

The patterns of lines of zeros at $s=a + t i$ are very similar to the graph above and values of $t$ only shift slightly at different $a$. However, the zeros at $z \rightarrow 0^-$ always remain $s=a \pm \frac{k \, \pi \, i}{\ln(2)},k \in \mathbb{N}$ and their imaginary part $t$ seems independent of the choice of $a$. This might be a clue for answering my second question (note that $2^s-2^{2a-s}$ has the same roots, however I did not find any connection).

Questions:

  1. Is there a counterexample with a zero lying off the critical line, but in the critical strip for $z \le -1$?

  2. When $z \rightarrow 0^-$ the function $Li_s(z)\, - \, Li_{1-s}(z)$ vanishes at $s=\frac12 \pm \frac{k \, \pi \, i}{\ln(2)}$ with $k \in \mathbb{N}$, however I failed to derive this apparently trivial result from the known formulae. Could this be proven?

Thanks.

This question loosely builds on this one, however is a bit simpler and I found the results to be more robust.

It seems that all zeros in the critical strip $0 \lt \Re(s) < 1$ of:

$$Li_s(z)\, \pm \, Li_{1-s}(z)$$

reside on the critical line $\Re(s)=\frac12$ for all $z \le -1$.

Below is a graph that shows where this function (using $\pm = -$) vanishes for $s=\frac12 \pm t\,i$ at different values of $z$. The lines marked in red all lead to a non-trivial zero of $\zeta(s)$, since $Li_s(-1)=\eta(s)$, with $\eta(s)$ being the Dirichlet Eta-function.

I have extended the graph towards $z \rightarrow 0^-$ to also show how some lines continue in that domain, however there clearly are zeros off the critical line when $z > -1$ (note: the lines coming from the left don't have a 'hard stop' at $z=-1$ and actually continue a short bit further to the right).

enter image description here

For the root finding process I used the following expression of the PolyLog function that I found to be evaluating much faster for higher values than the standard PolyLog function (in Maple):

$$Li_s(z) = \frac{\Gamma(1-s)}{(2\,\pi)^{1-s}} \left(i^{1-s}\,\zeta_H\left(1-s,\frac12+\frac{\ln(-z)}{2 \,\pi \, i}\right)+i^{s-1}\,\zeta_H\left(1-s,\frac12-\frac{\ln(-z)}{2 \,\pi \, i}\right)\right)$$

where $\zeta_H(s,q)$ is the Hurwitz zeta function.

Addition:

Numerical evidence suggests that the claim could be extended further into:

All complex zeros in the critical strip $0 \lt \Re(s) < 1$ of:

$$Li_s(z)\, \pm \, Li_{2a-s}(z)$$

reside on the critical line $\Re(s)=a$ for all $z \le -1$ and all $a \le \frac12$ (this might be related to this paper).

The patterns of lines of zeros at $s=a + t i$ are very similar to the graph above and values of $t$ only shift slightly at different $a$. However, the zeros at $z \rightarrow 0^-$ always remain $s=a \pm \frac{k \, \pi \, i}{\ln(2)},k \in \mathbb{N}$ and their imaginary part $t$ seems independent of the choice of $a$. This might be a clue for answering my second question (note that $2^s-2^{2a-s}$ has the same roots, however I did not find any connection).

Questions:

  1. Is there a counterexample with a zero lying off the critical line, but in the critical strip for $z \le -1$?

  2. When $z \rightarrow 0^-$ the function $Li_s(z)\, - \, Li_{1-s}(z)$ vanishes at $s=\frac12 \pm \frac{k \, \pi \, i}{\ln(2)}$ with $k \in \mathbb{N}$, however I failed to derive this apparently trivial result from the known formulae. Could this be proven?

Thanks.

Extended the claim (see header 'addition' in bold)
Source Link
Agno
  • 4.2k
  • 21
  • 28

Are all complex zeros of $Li_s(z)\, \pm \, Li_{1-s}(z)$ on the critical line or outside the critical strip for $z \le -1$?

This question loosely builds on this one, however is a bit simpler and I found the results to be more robust.

It seems that all zeros in the critical strip $0 \lt \Re(s) < 1$ of:

$$Li_s(z)\, \pm \, Li_{1-s}(z)$$

reside on the critical line $\Re(s)=\frac12$ for all $z \le -1$.

Below is a graph that shows where this function (using $\pm = -$) vanishes for $s=\frac12 \pm t\,i$ at different values of $z$. The lines marked in red all lead to a non-trivial zero of $\zeta(s)$, since $Li_s(-1)=\eta(s)$, with $\eta(s)$ being the Dirichlet Eta-function.

I have extended the graph towards $z \rightarrow 0^-$ to also show how some lines continue in that domain, however there clearly are zeros off the critical line when $z > -1$ (note: the lines coming from the left don't have a 'hard stop' at $z=-1$ and actually continue a short bit further to the right).

enter image description here

For the root finding process I used the following expression of the PolyLog function that I found to be evaluating much faster for higher values than the standard PolyLog function (in Maple):

$$Li_s(z) = \frac{\Gamma(1-s)}{(2\,\pi)^{1-s}} \left(i^{1-s}\,\zeta_H\left(1-s,\frac12+\frac{\ln(-z)}{2 \,\pi \, i}\right)+i^{s-1}\,\zeta_H\left(1-s,\frac12-\frac{\ln(-z)}{2 \,\pi \, i}\right)\right)$$

where $\zeta_H(s,q)$ is the Hurwitz zeta function.

Addition:

Numerical evidence suggests that the claim could be extended further into:

All complex zeros in the critical strip $0 \lt \Re(s) < 1$ of:

$$Li_s(z)\, \pm \, Li_{2a-s}(z)$$

reside on the critical line $\Re(s)=a$ for all $z \le -1$ and all $a \le \frac12$ (this might be related to this paper).

The patterns of lines of zeros at $s=a + t i$ are very similar to the graph above and values of $t$ only shift slightly at different $a$. However, the zeros at $z \rightarrow 0^-$ always remain $s=a \pm \frac{k \, \pi \, i}{\ln(2)},k \in \mathbb{N}$ and their imaginary part $t$ seems independent of the choice of $a$. This might be a clue for answering my second question (note that $2^s-2^{2a-s}$ has the same roots, however I did not find any connection).

Questions:

  1. Is there a counterexample with a zero lying off the critical line, but in the critical strip for $z \le -1$?

  2. When $z \rightarrow 0^-$ the function $Li_s(z)\, - \, Li_{1-s}(z)$ vanishes at $s=\frac12 \pm \frac{k \, \pi \, i}{\ln(2)}$ with $k=0,1,2,3, \dots$$k \in \mathbb{N}$, however I failed to derive this apparently trivial result from the known formulae. Could this be proven?

Thanks.

Are all zeros of $Li_s(z)\, \pm \, Li_{1-s}(z)$ on the critical line or outside the critical strip for $z \le -1$?

This question loosely builds on this one, however is a bit simpler and I found the results to be more robust.

It seems that all zeros in the critical strip $0 \lt \Re(s) < 1$ of:

$$Li_s(z)\, \pm \, Li_{1-s}(z)$$

reside on the critical line $\Re(s)=\frac12$ for all $z \le -1$.

Below is a graph that shows where this function (using $\pm = -$) vanishes for $s=\frac12 \pm t\,i$ at different values of $z$. The lines marked in red all lead to a non-trivial zero of $\zeta(s)$, since $Li_s(-1)=\eta(s)$, with $\eta(s)$ being the Dirichlet Eta-function.

I have extended the graph towards $z \rightarrow 0^-$ to also show how some lines continue in that domain, however there clearly are zeros off the critical line when $z > -1$ (note: the lines coming from the left don't have a 'hard stop' at $z=-1$ and actually continue a short bit further to the right).

enter image description here

For the root finding process I used the following expression of the PolyLog function that I found to be evaluating much faster for higher values than the standard PolyLog function (in Maple):

$$Li_s(z) = \frac{\Gamma(1-s)}{(2\,\pi)^{1-s}} \left(i^{1-s}\,\zeta_H\left(1-s,\frac12+\frac{\ln(-z)}{2 \,\pi \, i}\right)+i^{s-1}\,\zeta_H\left(1-s,\frac12-\frac{\ln(-z)}{2 \,\pi \, i}\right)\right)$$

where $\zeta_H(s,q)$ is the Hurwitz zeta function.

Questions:

  1. Is there a counterexample with a zero lying off the critical line, but in the critical strip for $z \le -1$?

  2. When $z \rightarrow 0^-$ the function $Li_s(z)\, - \, Li_{1-s}(z)$ vanishes at $s=\frac12 \pm \frac{k \, \pi \, i}{\ln(2)}$ with $k=0,1,2,3, \dots$, however I failed to derive this apparently trivial result from the known formulae. Could this be proven?

Thanks.

Are all complex zeros of $Li_s(z)\, \pm \, Li_{1-s}(z)$ on the critical line or outside the critical strip for $z \le -1$?

This question loosely builds on this one, however is a bit simpler and I found the results to be more robust.

It seems that all zeros in the critical strip $0 \lt \Re(s) < 1$ of:

$$Li_s(z)\, \pm \, Li_{1-s}(z)$$

reside on the critical line $\Re(s)=\frac12$ for all $z \le -1$.

Below is a graph that shows where this function (using $\pm = -$) vanishes for $s=\frac12 \pm t\,i$ at different values of $z$. The lines marked in red all lead to a non-trivial zero of $\zeta(s)$, since $Li_s(-1)=\eta(s)$, with $\eta(s)$ being the Dirichlet Eta-function.

I have extended the graph towards $z \rightarrow 0^-$ to also show how some lines continue in that domain, however there clearly are zeros off the critical line when $z > -1$ (note: the lines coming from the left don't have a 'hard stop' at $z=-1$ and actually continue a short bit further to the right).

enter image description here

For the root finding process I used the following expression of the PolyLog function that I found to be evaluating much faster for higher values than the standard PolyLog function (in Maple):

$$Li_s(z) = \frac{\Gamma(1-s)}{(2\,\pi)^{1-s}} \left(i^{1-s}\,\zeta_H\left(1-s,\frac12+\frac{\ln(-z)}{2 \,\pi \, i}\right)+i^{s-1}\,\zeta_H\left(1-s,\frac12-\frac{\ln(-z)}{2 \,\pi \, i}\right)\right)$$

where $\zeta_H(s,q)$ is the Hurwitz zeta function.

Addition:

Numerical evidence suggests that the claim could be extended further into:

All complex zeros in the critical strip $0 \lt \Re(s) < 1$ of:

$$Li_s(z)\, \pm \, Li_{2a-s}(z)$$

reside on the critical line $\Re(s)=a$ for all $z \le -1$ and all $a \le \frac12$ (this might be related to this paper).

The patterns of lines of zeros at $s=a + t i$ are very similar to the graph above and values of $t$ only shift slightly at different $a$. However, the zeros at $z \rightarrow 0^-$ always remain $s=a \pm \frac{k \, \pi \, i}{\ln(2)},k \in \mathbb{N}$ and their imaginary part $t$ seems independent of the choice of $a$. This might be a clue for answering my second question (note that $2^s-2^{2a-s}$ has the same roots, however I did not find any connection).

Questions:

  1. Is there a counterexample with a zero lying off the critical line, but in the critical strip for $z \le -1$?

  2. When $z \rightarrow 0^-$ the function $Li_s(z)\, - \, Li_{1-s}(z)$ vanishes at $s=\frac12 \pm \frac{k \, \pi \, i}{\ln(2)}$ with $k \in \mathbb{N}$, however I failed to derive this apparently trivial result from the known formulae. Could this be proven?

Thanks.

Added that the limit to zero needs to approach from the negative side (it doesn't work from the positive side).
Source Link
Agno
  • 4.2k
  • 21
  • 28
Loading
Source Link
Agno
  • 4.2k
  • 21
  • 28
Loading