Timeline for A question on non-archimedian Fourier transform
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2014 at 1:19 | answer | added | paul garrett | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 16, 2014 at 7:04 | vote | accept | Alexander Braverman | ||
| Aug 16, 2014 at 7:04 | answer | added | Alexander Braverman | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 14, 2014 at 14:46 | answer | added | Roman | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 12, 2014 at 13:08 | answer | added | Roman | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 12, 2014 at 10:19 | history | edited | Alexander Braverman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 121 characters in body
|
| Aug 12, 2014 at 6:53 | comment | added | Alexander Braverman | No, there is only a map from $\mathcal S^0$ to $\mathcal S$ (since both are spaces of compactly supported functions, there is no map in the opposite direction). You can think of $\mathcal S^0$ as the subspace of $\mathcal S$ consisting of functions which vanish on degenerate matrices. | |
| Aug 11, 2014 at 19:36 | comment | added | Allen Knutson | I would ordinarily think of a map $\mathcal S\to \mathcal S^0$, but you're regarding $\mathcal S^0$ as a subspace of $\mathcal S$. Is this by taking functions on $M(n)$ supported inside $GL(n)$, or is it by using the inner product somehow? | |
| Aug 11, 2014 at 19:09 | history | asked | Alexander Braverman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |