Timeline for Morphisms of supermanifolds
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 11, 2010 at 5:44 | history | edited | S. Carnahan♦ | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
correction
|
Mar 11, 2010 at 5:43 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | Oh, yeah. Reduction is a quotient. Editing... | |
Mar 11, 2010 at 5:25 | comment | added | Chris Schommer-Pries | Careful! It is dangerous to think of $C^\infty(\mathbb{R})$ as sitting inside the functions on $\mathbb{R}^{1|2}$ because such an inclusion is not natural/functorial/canonical. If you act by an automorphism of $\mathbb{R}^{1|2}$, this inclusion of algebras changes. You are not really "restricting" to $C^\infty(\mathbb{R}$. Rather it is better to quotient by nilpotents, which is a functorial construction. You then obtain the map on $C^\infty(\mathbb{R})$ as the induced map. | |
Mar 11, 2010 at 5:15 | vote | accept | Vamsi | ||
Mar 11, 2010 at 5:15 | vote | accept | Vamsi | ||
Mar 11, 2010 at 5:15 | |||||
Mar 11, 2010 at 5:12 | vote | accept | Vamsi | ||
Mar 11, 2010 at 5:15 | |||||
Mar 11, 2010 at 4:40 | history | answered | S. Carnahan♦ | CC BY-SA 2.5 |