Timeline for Why is the Hochschild homology of k[t] just k[t] in degrees 0 and 1?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2015 at 9:52 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 15, 2015 at 10:07 | |||||
| S Mar 15, 2015 at 1:01 | history | suggested | Dag Oskar Madsen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added latex
|
| Mar 15, 2015 at 0:36 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 15, 2015 at 1:01 | |||||
| Dec 18, 2009 at 17:55 | history | edited | Ilya Nikokoshev |
edited tags
|
|
| Oct 30, 2009 at 15:30 | answer | added | Vladimir Dotsenko | timeline score: 9 | |
| Oct 23, 2009 at 20:08 | answer | added | David Ben-Zvi | timeline score: 16 | |
| Oct 13, 2009 at 14:13 | answer | added | Kevin Walker | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 9, 2009 at 18:51 | vote | accept | Kim Morrison | ||
| Oct 8, 2009 at 4:49 | history | edited | Kim Morrison | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 366 characters in body
|
| Oct 7, 2009 at 20:25 | comment | added | Kim Morrison | I was rather assuming that you'd answer :-) | |
| Oct 7, 2009 at 20:24 | vote | accept | Kim Morrison | ||
| Oct 8, 2009 at 4:47 | |||||
| Oct 7, 2009 at 19:48 | answer | added | Ben Webster♦ | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 7, 2009 at 19:32 | comment | added | Ben Webster♦ | You were just trying to bait me with that one, weren't you? | |
| Oct 7, 2009 at 19:32 | answer | added | Ben Webster♦ | timeline score: 15 | |
| Oct 7, 2009 at 19:21 | history | asked | Kim Morrison | CC BY-SA 2.5 |