Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 11, 2014 at 23:18 comment added Geoff Robinson In fact, the number of classes of central involutions is the number of $N_{G}(S)$ orbits by conjugation on $\Omega_{1}(Z(S)) \backslash \{1_{G}\},$ where $S$ is a Sylow $2$-subgroup and $\Omega_{1}(Z(S))$ is the subgroup of $Z(S)$ generated by its involutions.
Aug 11, 2014 at 22:55 history edited Anurag CC BY-SA 3.0
Changed "is equal to" to "is at most" in EDIT2, following Martin Isaacs' comment.
Aug 11, 2014 at 22:51 comment added Anurag Thanks for correcting me. It should be that the number of classes of central involutions is at most the number of involutions in the center of a Sylow 2-subgroup. Since given a central involution f, if H is a Sylow 2-subgroup contained in the normalizer of f then f must itself belong to H as otherwise, H and f would generate a subgroup of order 2|H|.
Aug 11, 2014 at 21:37 comment added Marty Isaacs There is something wrong with "EDIT2" of the question. It is not true in general that the number of classes of central involutions in G is the number of involutions in the center of a Sylow 2-subgroup. Look at the alternating group A_5. It has just one class of involutions but the Sylow center contains three involutions.
Aug 7, 2014 at 11:43 history edited Anurag CC BY-SA 3.0
added 259 characters in body
Aug 7, 2014 at 9:20 history edited Anurag CC BY-SA 3.0
added 138 characters in body
Aug 7, 2014 at 9:08 answer added Derek Holt timeline score: 7
Aug 7, 2014 at 2:50 comment added Colin Reid The question reduces to fusion in a Sylow $2$-subgroup $S$ of $G$. We want to know, given $a \in S, b \in Z(S)$ distinct involutions that are in a given conjugacy class $C$ of $G$, does $ab$ lie in $C$? In other words, is $C'$ a union of cosets of $C' \cap Z(S)$, where $C' = (C \cup \{1\}) \cap S$? (We certainly need $C' \cap Z(S)$ to be a non-trivial group.)
Aug 7, 2014 at 1:55 comment added Anurag Kindly note that I am interested in only those conjugacy classes of involutions which contain a central involution. Since conjugate of a central involution is also central, it would mean that the conjugacy class would consist entirely of central involutions.
Aug 7, 2014 at 1:50 history edited Anurag CC BY-SA 3.0
clarified a few ambiguous statements
Aug 7, 2014 at 1:43 comment added Anurag Yes, I didn't notice that it is quite straightforward to show that the result is true if G has a unique conjugacy class of involutions. I am slightly rephrasing the question now. @ColinReid: I was talking about conditions on G and not the part of the statement following "if and only if"
Aug 6, 2014 at 23:49 comment added Geoff Robinson I don't know if you really said what you mean, but if there is a unique conjugacy class of involutions in $G$, the statement is true. By the way, I think you need to specify that $a$ and $b$ are distinct involutions.
Aug 6, 2014 at 23:49 comment added Colin Reid The condition is certainly necessary, since the product of two involutions is an involution if and only if they are distinct and commute.
Aug 6, 2014 at 23:33 history asked Anurag CC BY-SA 3.0