Timeline for 3n+1 problem and cycles
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2015 at 11:36 | answer | added | Gottfried Helms | timeline score: 9 | |
| Aug 4, 2014 at 11:38 | comment | added | Jose Capco | @Stefan agreed! | |
| Aug 4, 2014 at 9:16 | comment | added | Stefan Kohl♦ | With respect to Lagarias' bibliography: on February 12, 2012, when he updated his bibliography for the last time so far, Lagarias has written to me: "I am happy to hear about other articles but I have run out of energy for updating the annotated bibliography from 2010 -- on." -- I think this is quite a pity, and it would certainly be good if the further maintenance of this valuable bibliography would be passed on to somebody else, rather than just letting it become a document of purely historical interest by the time. | |
| Aug 3, 2014 at 22:56 | answer | added | user9072 | timeline score: 7 | |
| Aug 3, 2014 at 22:47 | comment | added | Stefan Kohl♦ | I can only confirm what Andreas Blass has written. The Wikipedia article on the Collatz conjecture is usually kept up-to-date: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collatz_conjecture. | |
| Aug 3, 2014 at 22:40 | comment | added | Andreas Blass | A priori, the Collatz conjecture could fail in two ways: a non-trivial cycle or a Collatz sequence tending to infinity. As far as I know, both possibilities are still open. | |
| Aug 3, 2014 at 22:34 | history | edited | Jose Capco | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 146 characters in body
|
| Aug 3, 2014 at 22:27 | history | asked | Jose Capco | CC BY-SA 3.0 |