Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Jul 31, 2014 at 9:31 history suggested R.P.
added algebraic topology tag
Jul 31, 2014 at 9:23 review Suggested edits
S Jul 31, 2014 at 9:31
Jul 31, 2014 at 8:48 comment added Qiaochu Yuan What do you need the Dold-Kan correspondence for? The category of chain complexes is already a presheaf category.
Jul 30, 2014 at 15:04 answer added Jeremy Rickard timeline score: 6
Jul 30, 2014 at 14:54 comment added abx @Jeremy Rickard: Right! Strange that Grothendieck doesn't put it that way.
Jul 30, 2014 at 14:53 comment added John Wiltshire-Gordon By the Dold-Kan correspondence, the category of chain complexes is a presheaf category.
Jul 30, 2014 at 14:48 history edited Jeremy Rickard CC BY-SA 3.0
grammar in title
Jul 30, 2014 at 14:07 comment added Jeremy Rickard @abx I think that follows from the other conditions. By induction on $i$, $\operatorname{ker}(d^i)$ is injective and so $0\to\operatorname{ker}(d^i)\to A^{i+1}\to\operatorname{ker}(d^{i+1})\to0$ splits.
Jul 30, 2014 at 13:30 comment added abx I think you need more, namely that $\mathrm{Ker}\, d^i$ is a direct factor of $A^i$ for each $i\geq 0$. See A. Grothendieck, Sur quelques points d'algèbre homologique, p. 146.
Jul 30, 2014 at 13:15 comment added Zhen Lin The title question is related to this one, but the body question seems to be something different.
Jul 30, 2014 at 13:11 review First posts
Jul 30, 2014 at 15:14
Jul 30, 2014 at 13:10 history asked W.Z. CC BY-SA 3.0