Timeline for If an abelian category $\mathcal{A}$ has enough injectives then so does $\mathrm{Ch}^{\geq 0}(\mathcal{A})$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Jul 31, 2014 at 9:31 | history | suggested | R.P. |
added algebraic topology tag
|
|
Jul 31, 2014 at 9:23 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jul 31, 2014 at 9:31 | |||||
Jul 31, 2014 at 8:48 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | What do you need the Dold-Kan correspondence for? The category of chain complexes is already a presheaf category. | |
Jul 30, 2014 at 15:04 | answer | added | Jeremy Rickard | timeline score: 6 | |
Jul 30, 2014 at 14:54 | comment | added | abx | @Jeremy Rickard: Right! Strange that Grothendieck doesn't put it that way. | |
Jul 30, 2014 at 14:53 | comment | added | John Wiltshire-Gordon | By the Dold-Kan correspondence, the category of chain complexes is a presheaf category. | |
Jul 30, 2014 at 14:48 | history | edited | Jeremy Rickard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
grammar in title
|
Jul 30, 2014 at 14:07 | comment | added | Jeremy Rickard | @abx I think that follows from the other conditions. By induction on $i$, $\operatorname{ker}(d^i)$ is injective and so $0\to\operatorname{ker}(d^i)\to A^{i+1}\to\operatorname{ker}(d^{i+1})\to0$ splits. | |
Jul 30, 2014 at 13:30 | comment | added | abx | I think you need more, namely that $\mathrm{Ker}\, d^i$ is a direct factor of $A^i$ for each $i\geq 0$. See A. Grothendieck, Sur quelques points d'algèbre homologique, p. 146. | |
Jul 30, 2014 at 13:15 | comment | added | Zhen Lin | The title question is related to this one, but the body question seems to be something different. | |
Jul 30, 2014 at 13:11 | review | First posts | |||
Jul 30, 2014 at 15:14 | |||||
Jul 30, 2014 at 13:10 | history | asked | W.Z. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |