Timeline for Cut and Fold Polyhedron!
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2014 at 0:16 | comment | added | Joseph O'Rourke | OK, Morteza. Regularity is key, for as you see in my answer, cube to tetrahedron is not rare. Cube to regular tetrahedron would be quite interesting. | |
| Jul 30, 2014 at 7:59 | comment | added | Morteza | @JosephO'Rourke: I'm not sure about the regularity, because I have no useful software to check, I will try to find the way. | |
| Jul 29, 2014 at 23:24 | comment | added | Joseph O'Rourke | I would be interested to learn of details of your {cube, regular tetrahedron} unfold/refold construction, for that would constitute a partial solution to one of the open problems in my book with Erik Demaine, Geometric Folding Algorithms. | |
| Jul 28, 2014 at 23:13 | answer | added | Joseph O'Rourke | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jul 28, 2014 at 23:09 | history | edited | Gerry Myerson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typos
|
| Jul 28, 2014 at 23:00 | history | edited | Morteza | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 23 characters in body
|
| Jul 28, 2014 at 22:58 | comment | added | Morteza | Yes, I mean the sums of areas are equal, this is a necessary condition, my question is "Is it sufficient?". | |
| Jul 28, 2014 at 22:43 | answer | added | Igor Rivin | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 28, 2014 at 22:40 | comment | added | Igor Rivin | What do you mean by "equal side areas"? Do you mean the SUMs of the areas are equal? | |
| Jul 28, 2014 at 22:17 | history | asked | Morteza | CC BY-SA 3.0 |