Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 13, 2014 at 20:05 comment added eatscrayons Some editing has been completed for this question, with some luck it should clear up any remaining confusion. Thanks everyone for the informed comments.
Aug 13, 2014 at 20:00 history edited eatscrayons CC BY-SA 3.0
added 86 characters in body; edited title
Aug 13, 2014 at 19:05 history edited eatscrayons CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1962 characters in body
Jul 28, 2014 at 3:28 comment added eatscrayons The 'nice' identity (cleanest and simplest, although not the fastest converging series) gives 10 decimal places of accuracy in 13 steps and improves gradually with additional indices. I am still reading through Borwein/Zuckers fast alogrithms/
Jul 27, 2014 at 18:31 comment added NAME_IN_CAPS How fast does your method compute $\Gamma(1/2)=\sqrt{\pi}$? That would be a useful trial case. Similarly see the formulas for $\Gamma(1/4)$ at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particular_values_of_the_Gamma_function And note there that Borwein/Zucker have quadratically fast algorithms for $\Gamma(n/24)$.
Jul 27, 2014 at 16:03 comment added eatscrayons If you mean where the function works it is exact for all real and imaginary values for gamma(x). I am unfortunately unfamiliar with much of what is in that paper (although I went through it all). Perhaps some background would be helpful, I am a junior in the Engineering program at my school. I apologize for my lack of proper vernacular for mathematics although there are currently 8 fast converging infinite series for the reciprocal gamma function in my notes. The Professors on campus have been helpful (one recommended using this site) but I do not know what (if anything) to do next.
Jul 27, 2014 at 11:11 comment added NAME_IN_CAPS Where are you in the complex plane, and how much precision do you want? There is a paper of Schmelzer and Trefethen that discusses computation of $\Gamma$, they give different methods and seem to favor Hankel contours and numerical integration in general. people.maths.ox.ac.uk/trefethen/publication/PDF/2007_122.pdf
Jul 27, 2014 at 3:22 comment added eatscrayons I've seen that one before, it doesn't seem very fast converging, also it requires a lot of calculations per step, am I perhaps missing something?
Jul 26, 2014 at 20:58 comment added Jeremy Rouse You could try the series given here.
Jul 26, 2014 at 19:59 review First posts
Jul 26, 2014 at 21:13
Jul 26, 2014 at 19:52 history asked eatscrayons CC BY-SA 3.0