Timeline for Commutative Noetherian Domains of Krull Dimension One
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2010 at 13:57 | comment | added | Amitsur | lol, of course! Thanks Georges Elencwajg. I guess I need to get some rest. Thank you all for your useful comments. | |
| Mar 10, 2010 at 13:46 | comment | added | Georges Elencwajg | Dear Amitsur, perhaps it seems less strange if you realize that you can take f=x+x^{-1} and that x then satisfies the equation x^2-fx+1=o, so that 1 and x generate A as a k[f]-module . | |
| Mar 10, 2010 at 13:27 | history | edited | Harry Gindi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 168 characters in body; added 13 characters in body
|
| Mar 10, 2010 at 13:23 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Harry Gindi | ||
| Mar 10, 2010 at 13:06 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | See the comments above. This is incorrect (note: being finitely generated over k is clearly necessary.) | |
| Mar 10, 2010 at 13:02 | comment | added | Amitsur | Thank you guys. I'll check the sources you gave me. So, the Laurent polynomial ring A=k[x,x^{-1}] must be finitely generated k[f]-module for some f in A then. This is kind of strange, isn't it? | |
| Mar 10, 2010 at 12:47 | history | edited | Harry Gindi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 120 characters in body; deleted 12 characters in body
|
| Mar 10, 2010 at 12:42 | history | answered | Harry Gindi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |